Teacher 'sexually abused pupil, 13, a dozen times, sent cash in pregnancy scare'
Teacher 'sexually abused pupil, 13, a dozen times, sent cash in pregnancy scare'
A Texas teacher was arrested this month after she reportedly sexually abused a student, 13, at least 12 times in recent months, sent him money and had a pregnancy scare
A teacher was busted for allegedly sexually abusing her 13-year-old student, reportedly having sex with him at least 12 times, sending him money via CashApp and having a pregnancy scare.
According to an arrest affidavit obtained by the Laredo Morning Times in Texas, Adriana Mariel Rullan, 27, had "sexual intercourse/sexual contact" with the student a dozen times, including at a middle school in the United Independent School District.
I definitely would’ve slept with her when I was 13 if she gave me the chance…which is exactly why it is and should be illegal. 13 year old kids aren’t developed enough to recognize a lot of bad ideas. A 27 year old teacher should be.
Exactly! It doesn't matter if a child "enjoys" the sexual contact, because that can be weaponized and their future can be stolen. It's unfortunately normalized for children in certain social spaces (especially celebrities) to date far upwards; we need better common knowledge about the danger of age gaps and the cycle of abuse it perpetuates.
Let's be real though, would you really have made a different choice 5 years later?
No but the difference is I would have made the choice at 18. At 13 you don't have that choice. Ur still a minor. She made it for you.
So she raped him 12 times, and we’re not using the word “rape?”
Some places have really specific definitions for rape, ie “forcibly inserting your penis…”. So what women do to men can never be called rape even though it “is”. Using the term for cases where it doesn’t specifically apply would be libel and you can/would be sued.
Sec. 22.011. SEXUAL ASSAULT. (a) A person commits an offense if:
(1) the person intentionally or knowingly:
(A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent;
(B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that person's consent; or
(C) causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person's consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or
source:https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.22.htm#22.011
while "rape" isn't defined, it is often used to describe sexual assault.
using "rape" in this context would be perfectly reasonable, and i think whoever wrote the article should have done so.
Rape. It's rape. Call it rape. Guys can be raped. That's what happened.
From what I've heard it's not legally advisable in most countries for media to lable things as rape prior to the perpetrator being convicted of rape. Also I think the law commonly defines rape as forceful penetration, at least in the US. So it's not necessarily the writer's/publisher's fault when the headlines don't call it what it is.
What a fucking disaster. She was delegated with one thing - to look after and educate kids. And she not only failed that, she failed our general standards of not touching kids, not fucking them. Why it's too hard for her to understand? What in this system failed to make her think it's ok?