"But to this solemn resolution I came; I was free, and they should be free also;"
Is the pleasure taken in the subsumption of one's [content] an example of joy that should be surrendered, or is it indicative of an avenue towards socketable operance|?
woaw, exciting content!
i cannot wait to purchase and consume additional content!
I’m so sorry this happened to you.
Thank you for creating content!
Interesting analysis of perceived motives between interaction environments; thank you.
I am glad for all the discussion in, and response to, this thread.
Same to you
Of course, we could've just MALIBAL'ed each other
and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7]
What a true joy it has been to 'do business' with you
The urls are cropped and cannot be clicked
Then Here For you Is something that is different from That
Thank you for the awe-fill-ing [ c o n t e n t ] I can take pleasure in steal*ing
Do you ever wonder what the last content you produce might be?
edited to include text with links
This is an adaptation of the
Creative Commons Certificate
published by Tomáš Rodr, as
of 2024 [https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/25302471-7755-4286-a02f-eb5bf9af38ca.png]
The Original Work, “Colonial Farm Road III”, licensed by Creative Commons
[https://analognowhere.com/license/] under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial
License [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/]. This adaptation is made and
published by Some Universal Friend(s) (the “Adapter”) under a Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/] The Adapter
modified the Original Work in the following respects: Replaced Misfits logo with an image
of Manning (which I also stole), swapped the text "the lemmy community for creators of fun" with "where I can
take pleasure by stealing", included a very long attribution. Using the Original Work or the
Adapted Work does not mean the individual doing so has earned a CC Certificate, nor may any organization or individual offer a “CC Certificate.” Note that the trademarks of Creative Commons
and the Adapter are the property of their owners and require permission to reuse. Anyone who
wants to take the CC Certificate is welcome to register here: https://certificates.creativecommons.org.”
moreso trying to underline the potential for stagnation the pinned tools may lead to; many of the would-be pioneers of genuine innovation seem to use extremely bloated and nonFOSS tools
It is an edited image
Oh golly, I'll call my lawyer.
Is CC-BY-NC satiated by a low-effort disclaimer on my profile?
get that netrunning skill leveled bruh It's obviously generated via an oplocromodalic process carried out by a cybernetic swarm intelligence
I hope I'm not blocked, dudes
YSK Snopes.com was taken over by investors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes#Change_of_ownership https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Richmond_(entrepreneur)#Snopes.com_lawsuit
https://www.wired.com/story/snopes-and-the-search-for-facts-in-a-post-fact-world/ https://www.courthousenews.com/fact-checker-snopes-owners-accused-corporate-subterfuge/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220923232402/https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/snopes-co-owners-acquire-remaining-140000348.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovrn_Holdings
Snopes.com has been thought of as a reputable and trusted site for fact-checking.
From 2016 to 2022, the original mom-and-pop owners were sued out of their company in what was described as a "hostile takeover". Snopes is now owned as a for-profit "programmatic advertising business".