Skip Navigation
universalfriend Some Universal Friend(s) @lemmy.blahaj.zone

"But to this solemn resolution I came; I was free, and they should be free also;"

Posts 4
Comments 29
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL HOLE OF FUN
  • Is the pleasure taken in the subsumption of one's [content] an example of joy that should be surrendered, or is it indicative of an avenue towards socketable operance|?

    woaw, exciting content!
    i cannot wait to purchase and consume additional content!

  • content creator slur
  • I’m so sorry this happened to you.

    Thank you for creating content!

  • YSK Snopes.com was taken over by investors
  • Interesting analysis of perceived motives between interaction environments; thank you.
    I am glad for all the discussion in, and response to, this thread.

  • exponential growth
  • Same to you
    Of course, we could've just MALIBAL'ed each other

  • Capital AIdea rule
  • and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7]

  • exponential growth
  • What a true joy it has been to 'do business' with you

  • exponential growth
  • The urls are cropped and cannot be clicked

  • exponential growth
  • Then Here For you Is something that is different from That

  • Capital AIdea rule

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk

    11
    exponential growth
  • Thank you for the awe-fill-ing [ c o n t e n t ] I can take pleasure in steal*ing

    Do you ever wonder what the last content you produce might be?

  • exponential growth
  • edited to include text with links

  • exponential growth

  • This is an adaptation of the Creative Commons Certificate published by Tomáš Rodr, as of 2024 [https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/25302471-7755-4286-a02f-eb5bf9af38ca.png] The Original Work, “Colonial Farm Road III”, licensed by Creative Commons [https://analognowhere.com/license/] under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/]. This adaptation is made and published by Some Universal Friend(s) (the “Adapter”) under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/] The Adapter modified the Original Work in the following respects: Replaced Misfits logo with an image of Manning (which I also stole), swapped the text "the lemmy community for creators of fun" with "where I can take pleasure by stealing", included a very long attribution. Using the Original Work or the Adapted Work does not mean the individual doing so has earned a CC Certificate, nor may any organization or individual offer a “CC Certificate.” Note that the trademarks of Creative Commons and the Adapter are the property of their owners and require permission to reuse. Anyone who wants to take the CC Certificate is welcome to register here: https://certificates.creativecommons.org.”

  • Free as in rule
  • moreso trying to underline the potential for stagnation the pinned tools may lead to; many of the would-be pioneers of genuine innovation seem to use extremely bloated and nonFOSS tools
    It is an edited image

  • exponential growth
  • Oh golly, I'll call my lawyer.
    Is CC-BY-NC satiated by a low-effort disclaimer on my profile?

  • literally me rule
  • get that netrunning skill leveled bruh It's obviously generated via an oplocromodalic process carried out by a cybernetic swarm intelligence

  • exponential growth

  • I hope I'm not blocked, dudes

  • Free as in rule
  • Well, if they existed...

  • literally me rule

    6

    YSK Snopes.com was taken over by investors

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes#Change_of_ownership https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Richmond_(entrepreneur)#Snopes.com_lawsuit

    https://www.wired.com/story/snopes-and-the-search-for-facts-in-a-post-fact-world/ https://www.courthousenews.com/fact-checker-snopes-owners-accused-corporate-subterfuge/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220923232402/https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/snopes-co-owners-acquire-remaining-140000348.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovrn_Holdings

    Snopes.com has been thought of as a reputable and trusted site for fact-checking.

    From 2016 to 2022, the original mom-and-pop owners were sued out of their company in what was described as a "hostile takeover". Snopes is now owned as a for-profit "programmatic advertising business".

    52