This is so true. A pity you got down voted. Obviously bigots don't like being called out.

O yeah, that's kind of right. The first question is improper to begin with. I don't agree with the wording "hostile" though, this is waaay over exaggerated, and I think the reason why there's so much people wo want some normality back. They want to hold a conversation (and make tactless mistakes like everyone else) without being told they are absolutely hostile. It should be more like "no, you mixed me up, I'm not Mark, I'm Jon"

Also. The question is halfway legit if someone has a romantic or sexual intention and wants to know if his preferences are met. This is absolutely legit. Though then the question shouldnt be 'a or b' but "Are you A?".

What do you want to do about competitive sports? Abolish separate rankings or let just everyone compete where and how he likes?

I'm quite sure this is a dilemma lots of people know. Doesn't have anything to do with ADHD or gender or else. Just plain humankind: What IS the meaning of life. (Well ok, this one got answered, kind of: 42)

Taktisch wählen ist leider auch nicht das goldene vom Ei, wir haben zwar mehr Parteien als Amerika, aber den Status quo Wald Entscheidungsgrundlage für das Wahlverhalten zum nehmen.. da bräuchten wir keine Parteienlandschaft mehr.

Holen wir uns lieber eine vernünftige Ersatzstimmenregelung✊

That is actually quite impolite and stupid (from both perspectives, not just one though). The "yes" is impolite and passive aggressive, and person B should just interpret the unselective answer "yes" as "I don't care, just call me whatever you want bcz I don't want to tell you obviously". Plus it shouldn't matter anyway, aside from anything gender specific like some sports.

Cool. Die Variante -ens macht zwar auch etwas her, Phettbergs Ansatz wirkt auf mich allerdings noch etwas klarer, und die Historie ist allemal einen Bonus Wert.