i can still allow for them to be misinformed and or differently oriented- so not necessarily evil. as for fucking them over, i don't care so much about that directly- i have more modest ambitions. i want people to see how often there's a great big elephant in the room that you're really 'not supposed to' talk about. eating 20 downvotes for an innocuous comment is revelatory

uhh, were you paying attention to the zionist messaging boasting/celebrating/calling for further genocide throughout the last year?

musk is a piece of shit but why is this investigation in USAID's purview?

wrong thread/

sorry in advance for the strays you'll catch for saying as much.. yeah, its heavily brigaded/astroturfed just about everywhere you go, nowadays. we're to believe this is the common sentiment because by god, look at how many downvotes they can muster... i'm ambivalent, the truth isn't something they can bully out of my hands

this of course after using ai to ban 2.3 million 'security threat' aps.

you still talk to democrats, curious.

tulsi is a flawed human being, we all are- but she is not a double agent for russia. there, i said it, downvotes please.

wouldn't condemn snowden-- sadly, that's more than i was hoping for

yeah i wanna know if that bias was before or after apr 24

shh, don't tell mossad.

and op is wrong to implicate only republicans... so i guess we've come to some accord

did biden have to sign?? can you at least admit it was bipartisan or does that shake you to your tribalist core?

"On April 24, President Joe Biden signed legislation requiring TikTok parent ByteDance to sell to a U.S. owner within a year or to shut down."

"On April 24, President Joe Biden signed legislation requiring TikTok parent ByteDance to sell to a U.S. owner within a year or to shut down."

"On April 24, President Joe Biden signed legislation requiring TikTok parent ByteDance to sell to a U.S. owner within a year or to shut down."

before or after the democrats tried to shut it down?

"and feel offended if I want to concentrate on my duties instead of talking to them" this sounds like projection to me and its hard for me to shake that assessment.. keeping to yourself is generally navigable and most people understand and accept others' social orientation. are you maybe informed by a singular moment that you're dwelling on? as for being 'on the spectrum' that means vastly different things from one point to the next and if it doesn't complicate the advice people are willing to give to you, it could be a crutch you're imbuing with more dependence than is necessary.

yet still not as persuasive as my housecat...

doesn't that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P