Same with "Do you mind doing x?" "Yeah sure"; so you mind doing it? I get what they mean with the response, but it annoys me every time haha
I only disagree with the drinking water one to be honest. The others I find legitimately annoying. I still wear sunscreen, but only because sunburn is even worse
Yeah that's fair. Good thing I'm not in the army I guess haha. I wouldn't be a good fit anyways >.<
That is true, but I feel my chances would be smaller if I were fucking around with grabbing my gun from my back first
Woah, that's pretty neat. Do you have any names of drones I can look up? Seems like an interesting rabbit hole to dive into
I mean honestly, I would not consider it because drones are tiny and quick. I don't think I'd be able to shoot one.
It will be federated after a bit, the owner first wants to see how intensive it is on the server I believe
The H in ADHD is always used now. I've got a diagnosis ADHD and don't have the H either. It's just what it's called now.
It indeed looks like Little Kitty, Big City!
The game is available on a bunch of platforms, including XBox, PS5, Nintendo Switch & Steam (it is also Steam Deck verified).
Edit: not on PS5 apparently
Wouldn't that just be a fertility rate below 1?
Rate of 2: 2 babies are born per human death, population grows
Rate of 1: 1 baby is born per death, population remains the same
Rate of 0.5: 1 baby is born for every 2 deaths, pop. decreases.
Rate of 0: no babies are born, but people still die.
What would a negative fertility rate mean? A rate of -1? I don't think it could exist.
Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be "in space", not the minimum height for achieving orbit.
That doesn't really mean anything. You could achieve an orbit at a lower altitude if you wanted to, it would decay faster, but you could do it. The 100km karman line is an arbitrary thing, there is no solid line where on one side you can orbit and on the other side you can't.
I agree; the comment I was replying to seemed to imply that there was a minimum height requirement, or height by itself equaled orbit. But that's just my interpretation of it.
Well this seems like a bad semantic argument to me.
Maybe it is, but personally I prefer to see the result 100% finished. I am very impressed by the booster catch, and the non-stop camera feed on Starship was awesome, but I would like to see a full mission before saying that they reached orbit. And to me, demonstrating capability usually means doing it.
So what you're saying is that SpaceX deliberatly doesn't let Starship orbit, to keep reentry predictable. Which is what [email protected] said; they don't actually orbit.
Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be "in space", not the minimum height for achieving orbit.
Finally, I disagree with the note that having "enough fuel" to reach orbit means they have demonstrated such capability; I believe they easily could achieve this, but they haven't actually demonstrated it yet.
Feature request: opening Lemmy posts in Sync
Hi! I would really appreciate a feature allowing Sync to open Lemmy posts from e.g. my browser. I'm not an Android dev so I do not have a clue of how feasible this is, but it'd make me really happy :)
Anyways, appreciate the work you're doing, please don't burn yourself out too much
Make the Ruleopean Union Better
⚠️WARNING⚠️ certified NOT-A-SHITPOST!!
This is a petition from EU citizens, who believe conversion therapy should be explicitly illegal in the European Union. If this petition reaches 1 000 000 votes, and at least 7 EU member states have reached their own "threshold" of minimum local votes, the European Commision will be obligated to consider this. So please, if you are able, vote on this Citizen's Initiative, and share it with others! The submissions close May 17th, 2025.
Below is the description on the Initiative page:
> Objectives > We call on the European Commission to propose a binding legal ban on conversion practices targeting LGBTQ+ citizens in the European Union:
> Conversion Practices are interventions aimed at changing, repressing or suppressing the sexual orientation, gender identity and/or gender expression of LGBTQ+ persons.
> Such practices, due to their discriminatory, degrading, harmful and fraudulent nature have been qualified as torture by the United Nations, and are currently being banned in a growing number of States.
> The EU plays a key role in the protection of fundamental rights and should take actions to fight against all inhuman practices. The Commission should propose a directive adding conversion practices to the list of euro-crimes and/or amend the ongoing directive on equality (2008) to include a ban on these practices.
> Furthermore, to fight against the legislative moratorium, the Commission should also enforce a non-binding resolution calling for a widespread ban of conversion practices in the EU.
> Finally, we call on the Commission to amend the Victims’ Rights Directive to establishes minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of conversion practices.
> All member states should introduce a ban on conversion practices or review their current ones.