The CVE has to do with the utility not correctly identifying private IP addresses supplied to it in a non-standard format, such as hexadecimal. This would cause the 'node-ip' utility to treat a private IP address (in hex format) such as " 0x7F.1..." (which represents 127.1...) as public.

This is a ridiculous expectation. Providing addresses in an unsupported format doesn't yield correct results? Who wouldda thunk it. Clean up your fucking code and pass it in as expected, or make your own damn node-ip.

Got a lot less racist, but definitely more crazy

My professor made me install TeamViewer to our lab computers despite strong pushback from me, and perfectly functioning ssh access through the campus VPN. I can't wait to send this to him.

I've been using them on both my phone and desktop, works great!

Removes the ability to zoom between the lenses. I welcome the change, I've had experiences where I'd want to be at 5x zoom and would accidently flip down to 4.9x and swap lenses.

This is an optional setting in the "pro" tab in Google camera

I think you're mistaking T9 dialing with T9 texting. T9 Dialing uses the letter on the keys to search through your contacts to make find a number. 236 has the letters BEN. It would also return someone named Admond or a contact with 236 in the number. Before, iPhones would only return the result of a number with 236 in it, and you would have to search through you address book if you didn't know their number

https://join-lemmy.org/docs/administration/tor_hidden_service.html

I know, the joke was there and I had to take it. I wholeheartedly agree with you however

Legere was the best thing to happen to that company. They haven't made a good move since he left

I saw this the other day on my computer, then I checked and most of it was system monitor, so I think it was just a memory leak or something

I miss the Moto Z days. Those were some excellent phones and being able to slap an extra battery on the back was amazing. Mods could've gone so much further if they put some more R&D in it

Any client rejection would have to occur server side. I'm assuming that the client doesn't even report to the server if it's running headless. Nonetheless, it'd be trivial to mod the client to report that it's not running headless even if it is.

I have and use a Microsoft account. I would always setup my computer offline because I don't want my home folder to be called "myema"[email protected]

Seriously who thought that was a good idea? Your account literally has your name tied to it, call it that!

Even Google products have a longer lifespan 😖

I've since moved on to Tidal. Bought it at $30 when root mods started to be developed, but never really went anywhere.

Image alt:

• 2021-04-13: Interested in car thing
• 2022-10-18: order placed after discounted to $30
• 2022-10-21: shipped
• 2024-05-23: Discontinue notice
• 2024-12-09: Service discontinued

...I just put a Zigbee contact sensor on my mailbox lid and called it a day...

To be fair, if we discredited research from individuals with mental illness half of our research would be gone.

But yeah, it was mostly a proof of concept of someone happened to plug a bad USB into an air gapped machine with a mic and speakers

Not just removed, but removed within the hour

To be fair "potential next president" already answers if someone is corruptable

A crackhead