It's both. Even terrible people with something to lose are less likely to throw it all away.

If this guy makes $35k a year at dollar general, he probably doesn't go on a murder spree.

But you could also just not be an asshole. Why go after random people instead of someone who actually helps cause the bullshit?

When does he come to Nebula?

If there's one issue, ever, that you should be at least a little "both sides" on, it's this one.

There's no way you can honestly argue only one side of this.

If you do, do it for Jordan Klepper's wit. It's truly impressive how fast he comes up with these and how deft he is at it.

I could do it in writing over an hour. He does it on the fly in seconds and is able to manage the conversation at the same time. It's incredible.

Well, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people.

Also the rich people help run ads telling the working class who to vote for. And that works often enough to be effective.

Maybe put the results in a spoiler tag.

::: spoiler Label
Hidden text
:::

Seems not to work on Boost client.

I was in M2-XFE. That whole experience certainly taught a lot about the power of narrative and propaganda. And the later blockade showed what leadership failures look like.

We always had the advantage in that blockade, and could have stayed there for another year had the allies stuck together. Or we could have executed real plans to break them and end the war. Instead we did the worst of both.

Was this one a drag queen?

Haven't they done it twice before? Something like 2006 and 2014?

They refused to respond to an Australian government investigation. (Because Elon fired the two people who interfaced with Australia.)

The fine is not directly because they haven't cracked down*, but because they couldn't competently answer if they're handling it at all.

(* and they've probably fired enough trust and safety people that they're also having trouble there, but that's not exactly what the fine is for.)

Wanna bet? There are ways to frog in a boiling pot this. And chrome isn't the only browser that will support blocking Firefox. (They'll argue Chromium is not Google, only Chrome).

As a software dev, I don't think there really is a better way. One thing you could do to avoid this is to install a second drive and boot to completely different OSes. You could boot to a Linux drive for personal stuff, and only use Windows for gaming.

These gaming companies are pretty aware that they go bankrupt if they either get a reputation for abusing anti-chrst data OR are full of cheaters. They have some incentive to use data ethically. But it's still a good thing to keep an eye on.

4.8 is still .NET Framework, supported for the next ten years at least, and an easy transition.

Moving to 6 or 7 is more involved and might take actual effort (but might be nice for Linux compatibility). Not moving from 3.5 to 4.8 is an oversight.

It’s possible to support the Palestinians but not Hamas.

In sentiment, maybe. In reality? What concrete things can you do to benefit Palestinians that don't also benefit Hamas? Hamas are Palestinians.

That's like saying "I support Israel's right to defend itself, but not to harm innocent Palestinians." You don't get to choose. It's a package deal.

have been in a position to end the conflict for ages

There's only one way Israel can end the conflict. I don't think you're in favor of it.

"Equally evil" is such a weird phrase. Who was more evil, Jeffrey Dahmer or Jim Jones? And I don't think standing up for evil because the other side is more evil is any better of a stance than enlightened centrism.

As a devil's advocate, Hamas uses 100% of their capability for evil, even sacrificing their own lives in the name of religion to inflict the maximum damage. Israel doesn't use 10% of their capacity, and has more justifiable reasons for doing so.

This does not mean I endorse Israel. You're right in that Israel causes more overall harm.

Yeah, that's not the best example. It's extremist and popular, but not a straw man at all.

I'm generally in favor of parents being able to make decisions for their children (particularly infants) with little involvement from the government.

I don't think you should pierce a baby's ears. However unless the government can show significant harm, they should stay out of it.

You can speculate on the more controversial version of this.

Probably Netflix, YouTube, and streaming apps first. I'd say banks, but banks are slow. Games won't take long. If there's not enough blowback it'll spread to every website that uses captchas today.

I'm not really in favor of a wealth tax. Maybe, if we really need to claw back our mistakes, but I think there are better approaches.

A tax on loans based on wealth seems great though. If you have the wealth, why are you borrowing? What are the legitimate uses of secured loans?

Capital gains taxes should be higher than payroll taxes. Always and forever.

Marginal tax rates exist for a reason, and it's absurd that we stop progressive taxation after $700k. The difference between making $800k/year and making $15m/year is ridiculous. At $800k/year you at least want to make the business last for a decade. After you cash out for $15m in a year, are you really accountable to anyone?

https://takeout.google.com

Download your data while you still can.