Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MY
MyBrainHurts @lemmy.ca
Posts 1
Comments 24
It may provoke Trump, but Canada should cancel the purchase of F-35 fighter jets from the U.S.
  • Oh absolutely, thank heavens trump is cartoonishly cruel and selfish, it's quickly united everyone else. A clever, subtle and patient trump would've been much more dangerous.

    I just fully disagree with the earlier comment that this is a one off trump only aberration.

  • It may provoke Trump, but Canada should cancel the purchase of F-35 fighter jets from the U.S.
  • What? Ukraine was first invaded before trump and then again without him there. In both cases, the security provided was less than what was originally guaranteed. Ukraine got screwed by believing America.

    It's not just trump, there's a whole Senate and Congress cheering him on. I would not gamble our future by relying on it to only be a trump phenomenon. If Americans had elected him once and horrified of their mistake, never came close again, that'd be one thing. But we has elected with a plurarlity of votes.

    America has proven an untrustworthy ally and that thwir promises aren't worth the paper their written in.

    I don't think Canada's security should be "well, let's just hope they don't do it yet again!"

  • What phone can I switch to that gives the least money to American companies?
  • I think you might be missing a few things.

    First, sure there's probably some minor feedback but really, outside of luxury goods (which neither Apple or Google are at this point) more customers is seen as better by investors/the market.

    Yes, the market is all theatre but amazingly, it's theatrics to which a great deal of attention is paid. The more share prices of magnificent 7 stocks drop, the more that affects those who have actual power and influence.

    Heck, forget abandoning smartphones, living in a cave would be the ultimate way to not contribute to America. But most folks want to balance their morals with a functional life, which for many includes a smartphone.

    If you want to slap back, instead of trying desperately to convince maybe a handful of folks to switch to dumb phones over tarrifs, much better to help a lot of people make incremental but helpful changes.

  • We Need to Avoid American Media!
  • Totally fair, but maybe we advocate for pirating it? I agree with you it's important to know what the enemy is thinking etc (also, in less apocalyptic terms, I agree with JSM "He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that.") but I don't wouldn't advocate people pay and support those American companies.

  • Canada proposes 100% tariffs on Tesla, I have an alternative: open the door to Chinese EVs
  • I thought you had a typo... You're unimpressed because China has... population growth?

    And yes, in the path to decarbonization, they've been explicit that it's a process. You cannot expect a developing economy to instaneously transition to a net zero economy while growing, that's an insane ask.

    If you read the second article you linked a bit more closely, you'll note that they are talking about China's rapid development. It would be absurd to imagine an economy growing that rapidly could do so while keeping their total emissions the same.

    Meanwhile though, how does this compare to America? What major decarbonization efforts are they undergoing? To my understanding, they are so hell bent on undoing Green projects that they are even cancelling those that Biden put in red districts in an attempt to shield them from the Republicans almost sociopathic disregard for climate change. So, in a question of whom we'd prefer on climate policy, I'm not quite understanding what the heck you're trying to say? China's not perfect but you can see a path to climate neutrality, without wishful thinking, do you see anything comparable at a Federal level in America?

  • It may provoke Trump, but Canada should cancel the purchase of F-35 fighter jets from the U.S.
  • Yeah, they've pretty strongly turned from recent history though. No one in NATO believes the US could be trusted to uphold article 5 anymore. That's the whole issue.

    Hell, why doesn't Ukraine have the nuclear deterrnet that it had after the collapse of the Soviet Union? Because they foolishly believed American security promises, which were given in exchange for them releasing their nukes.

  • Canada proposes 100% tariffs on Tesla, I have an alternative: open the door to Chinese EVs
  • Source on the abandoning decreasing emissions? They're shuttering coal plants, starting the world's largest hydro electric project, pumping out the next generation of EV cars, massively funding green tech etc. And I'm hard pressed to find anything comparable in America's course.

    And sure, bears can swim but few can do so over an ocean. Even a casual understanding of modern history or an ounce of common sense should show you how much easier it is to invade a country next door than it is to maintain supply lines across an ocean.

  • Canada proposes 100% tariffs on Tesla, I have an alternative: open the door to Chinese EVs
  • Which is more of a threat, the bear actually threatening to eat you or the one an ocean away?

    And to make things more interesting, which is worse for the world, the country doing their damnedest to make climate change worse or the one that has essentially single-handedly made solar power a viable alternative?

  • Canada proposes 100% tariffs on Tesla, I have an alternative: open the door to Chinese EVs
  • In a geopolitical sense, they are more useful to us right now for two reasons:

    1. Any shot that hits Tesla hits America incredibly effectively as Tesla is one of the Magnificent 7, which means it has an outsized effect on the American markets/economy.

    2. Showing America that the world is ready to decouple from it and support to its rival over this nonsense is a powerful signal/threat.

  • For Vancouverites, Cypress is American owned but Mount Seymour is Owned by a local family and Grouse seems owned by a Canadian headquartered company.

    Was about to renew my Cypress pass and double checked this.

    As far as I can tell, Cypress is owned by Boyne Resorts (Michigan based.)

    Seymour seems owned by a local Vancouver family while Grouse is owned by Northland Properties Corporation which started in BC and is headquartered in Vancouver.

    Looks like I'll be trying out Seymour next season!

    2