But arresting and then having it cleared costs time and energy but adds nothing to society.

Look, I'm not advocating that they should have more freedom. I am saying there is already freedom because the world is not as clear as the law states, so police should be properly trained to be aware of their role.

My general point I think follows from your last paragraph, their role to protect the people comes before following the letter of the law, but they should always try to uphold the intent.

If the law says by possessing marijuana you are a dealer, but a cop finds someone with a small amount, it's likely for recreation and their possession brings no harm to society or others (what the law wants to prevent). Arresting them may be following the letter of the law, but not the intent (to stop distribution).

Another invented situation: cop pulls over someone driving erratically and too fast, then the driver is a woman who escaped being raped by her date. She was driving erratically because she was emotionally and physically distraught. Is giving her a ticket helping anyone? The cop could say "okay, take it easy and slow while I follow you to make sure you're out of danger and feel safe getting home".

Sorry I can't be more specific, I haven't gotten years of training on such situations.

Which part? Understanding how they should follow the law in the real world and the responsibility that brings? They could be wrong or right in any situation (they aren't lawyers and the world doesn't conform to laws) and they should be aware of that.

Anyone got suggestions for instances to join for a new account?

Not on a whim, based on training on the law and its intent. Not that they get that training like that in the USA, AFAIK.

Police should also be accountable to laws and weigh that responsibility against each situation.

About 40-50% culling of management would hopefully lead to a more sustainable system.

Their relentless hunt for profits is damaging every ecosystem they enter.

Sure, but the world is too grey to always follow laws exactly as written. If someone is sitting on a beach smoking some weed, they are not going to damage society or others by doing so. Arresting them for drugs that only harm themselves, costs society money for the arrest and provide no benefit to anyone.

Unless our laws are perfect (likely impossible) there will always need to be some leeway for interpretation of the spirit of the law. Cops should not blindly follow laws but understand their intent to prevent harm towards others.

Also, laws are slow to change and don't often stay up to date with societal changes.

Which kinda solves one problem, but you think a non-tech-savvy person will remember not to press the Netflix button on the TV remote that gives them the crappy TV app? For a gamer/etc. that knows what button a TV remote is going to correspond to "o" in the on screen UI, sure. Useful info for those that didn't know!

I'd put shield ahead of consoles. It's way quicker to start than consoles, uses less standby power (I guess), and the included remote and interface make it easier for "normal" people to use.

While they definitely have many products in the cheap junk category, but I think they have pretty good hardware in the mid-upper range.
Software is the real junk in Samsung products; their high-end TVs would be great if it wasn't for the crappy software and updates.

I mean, this kinda only applies to devices that need the highest energy density.

For situations where space isn't much of an issue, it can make more sense to use other forms of batteries that are cheaper per MWh. I agree Li-ion won't be replaced in phones etc. but for some applications that are stationary, it can make commercial sense to use something else.

While I'd like to believe this, if Putin comes to some peaceful agreement with Ukraine, the international community will just wait until people are distracted by the next big news story and then let Putin back in.

I'd rather be cynical and happily surprised than optimistic and disappointed.

Yeah I can imagine it would take a lot of energy to both do your job well and constantly justify its existence to your peers.

I get the sense that is changing... People are worried that many jobs will soon be automated and see that the trades will be safe from that for quite some time.

Damn, that's tough. Working in a new field must be hard enough, but it must be even tougher when no one understands why it exists or values it's existence.

If you don't mind, what was your "dream job"? It seems incredible that you could study for 8 years in a topic and get no working experience that would indicate that you're going to hate it when you finish.

I never had a clear idea of a specific dream job, just a field. Now I have such a job I'd say 60-80% is interesting stuff I might do as a hobby (if not doing it at work), with the rest being bureaucratic bullshit most jobs involve.
It's not super high paying considering the field, but it is often satisfying.

Same here. Do you also use pi-hole or another ad-blocker?

To add to the explanations, here are some examples that might help:
There are various transportation methods, e.g. cars

There are various transportation methods, i.e. ways for a person to move from one location to another

Is a post about linguistics colloquial?

Post about linguistics, but they used i.e. when they meant e.g.