Still hosted by MTV's Dan Cortese.

I feel like being a "picky eater" is something that a lot more people want to admit to. So, they get introduced to food they never experienced before, likely with novel tastes or textures that are not like what they eat at home.

They treat kids for being picky eaters, but that generally requires parents to have the knowledge and finances to get their kid help.

McDonald's hasn't even cornered the market in the USA.

I have yet to travel somewhere that didn't have a local fast food chain.

They would have rescheduled for that.

MTV's Spring Break would be a lot crazier.

You can switch recommendations to "familiar" if you don't want new music.

Who who can afford this?

It depends on the person.

I think they, for the majority of people, there is a rough number that could be derived from a standard of living they would want and not have to work. It isn't a common number across people as people want different things.

That said, there are some people for whom there isn't a number to satisfy them. Wealth becomes a high score to measure against others. For them, there is no good enough.

That's because the appropriate response to not agreeing to the terms and conditions is to leave.

Yes, how to dry age meat would be very useful to a vegan.

Naw, I'm too lazy for that.

A few things.

First, it becomes a question whether it is in Ireland's interest to allow an attack on the EU while maintaining its neutrality. Your proposal focuses solely on the defense of Ireland, but there may be negative impacts in sitting out a conflict involving the EU. Could Ireland sustain a Brexit even if it isn't attacked.

Second, you're right that small militaries don't really contribute a lot to NATO. NATO had been trying to convert the Baltic states to focus on specialized units over fielding a general army because a general army of the size those nations could produce aren't going to be a big affect on the battlefield.

Third, you are starting to describe the beginnings to what the National Guard in the USA became. The National Guard came from state militias and is used as an organ of individual states for civil defense and emergency response. Having a guerrilla force is good for self-defense, but it is also useful to have an internal militia able to deploy after natural disasters and other events to rebuild and restore order. A militia organizational structure would be a check on the state should it try to use the militia against the people.

I understand that. I'm just wondering if you can push these rulemaking bodies to the legislative branch and what it would look like.

So, as a dumb question, what would it take for all rule-making bodies to be under the legislative branch instead of the executive branch? Do you devolve the responsibility to one house only? Do you require elected officials on these committees or can you devolve these tasks to a legislative controlled body?

Try Ask Lemmy posts?

Even government agencies price a human life around $5M. This is shockingly cheap.

Part of the issue with the value of college isn't that it educated, but that it acted like an ordeal to overcome and filtered out people who didn't have the makings of being a leader. Not all of that is due to educational ability.

This is explains why the people I know who love Doctor Who liked Star Trek: Picard. If you can suspend your disbelief for Doctor Who, Picard had some crazy scenes that felt good in the moment but kind of locally breaks reality and seems kind of stupid in the broader context.

I'm a structural engineer; I design the structural elements of the bridge. Civil engineers design the geometry of the bridge and the road/sidewalk/track it serves. Geotechnical engineers verify that the soil can withstand the design loads and help with foundation design. If water is involved, hydraulic engineers deal with the openings on water.

We try to keep architects as far away from the design as possible.

I don't know. I've had this issue with some adults as well.