While tens of thousands of people have joined Facebook groups in Sweden and Denmark calling for no longer buying American, Norwegian company Haltbakk Bunkers has announced that it will stop supplying US military vessels with fuel.
At first it somewhat makes sense to organise on a platform, almost everyboy is using. In a next step, they should move their group to some platform of the Fediverse to boycott Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, and alike.
I agree. But the steps are not exclusive. You can create "communities" on another platform as well.
You just tell everyone on facebook that official annnouncements are on the other platform and people think its 7331 and move to it because they want to be part of.
Consumer crap won't change anything. This issue is so much deeper than anyone seems to realize.
Stopping the fuelling of US military vessels is real news. The world is reverting to military based economies that the West hasn't seen since the 1950's. The age of William Shockley and venture capital are over.
Now is a good time to learn the real history of Silicon Valley and the history of computing in depth. Pick up a deep understanding of why this is where the Cold War was won. The events happening now make far more sense if you understand how VC and the exponential growth of silicon changed the world. Intel's failure seems likely to mark the effective end of the era. Stuff is about to get ugly.
Consumer boycotts are not sufficient by themselves. However they do serve to reduce the economic strength of the hostile nation.
They also signal to the politicians that political actions is backed and demanded by the population.
The US wants to forbid talking about boycotts in some states. the German parliament passed a resolution to condemn the BDS movement. When the ICJ concluded in its advisory opinion regarding the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian land that there most be no economic complicity in the occupation, the German chancellor Scholz condemned the ICJs legal conclusion as "disgusting".
They would not attack consumer boycotts in such ways, if they would not fear them.