There was an opportunity to do that a little over a month ago. But because Democrats didn't put up the god-perfect candidate, voters opted for the dictator, then complained when he started acting like a dictator.
Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win. I certainly hope we learned our lesson.
Yup, obviously they should have realised that Drump was a fine candidate whose personal charm, decorum and honestly would overwhelm any other candidate.
No response to "Democrats ran a shit candidate who didn't even mention healthcare or taxing the rich, and never won a primary " involves the words 'Trump', 'putin', 'nazi', or 'republicans'.
Donald Trump isn't the problem. The problem isnt that donald trump is so attractive or that the voters are so stupid.
That's like blaming fire for drawing an audience or being mad that ice is slippery.
The problem is that Democrats don't want to win if it means a progressive agenda. The function of the Democratic party is to mollify progressives and help ratchet us to the right by providing a fig leaf for the same owner class that does almost all the donating to politics and is literally driving the legislative and judicial agenda of the GOP.