U.S. won’t withhold aid to Israel, walking back threat over conditions in Gaza
U.S. won’t withhold aid to Israel, walking back threat over conditions in Gaza
The United States will not withhold military aid from Israel, the State Department said Tuesday, after top Biden administration officials warned a month ago that they would consider doing so if the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza did not improve.
State Department deputy spokesman Vedant Patel said there would be no change to U.S. policy at the end of the 30-day deadline the U.S. set for Israel to improve conditions in Gaza. Aid groups and U.N. officials say Israel has largely failed to comply with U.S. demands, a Washington Post analysis found.
Clown country
We gotta keep doing this or Trump will get elected
Imagine if the Democrats hadn't supported the genocide every step of the way, they might have lost all 3 branches of government.
Oops, all platitudes!
At this point I believe the US simply can't withhold support from Israel for some reason.
And they also can't publically disclose why that is.
But the consequences of withholding aid must be worse (at least for those in government positions) than a Trump dictatorship.Biden, like many others in both the Democratic and Republican Party, are Christian Zionists. It's ideological above all else for them. But I bet the money doesn't hurt
For many, the belief that God still has a special relationship with Israel also includes an emphasis on eschatology, or the end times, and the belief that Israel’s establishment is part of a series of events that will lead to large-scale war, leading to the battle of Armageddon and the return of Jesus.
Several theories:
-
Epstein was mossad. There are a lot of tapes with a lot of people.
-
Lots of Zionist billionaires: America is a plutocracy that acts on their behalf
-
Some sort of "great game" calculus of keeping a client state for regional instability (Biden apparently believes this based on old speeches)
-
Biden in particular has a melted brain. Many people have pointed out that Reagan was tougher on Israel than Biden has been. Reagan would set red lines and then say "you will comply."
I'm convinced the answer is "Israel absolutely has nukes and will use them if we stop providing them conventional arms"
But the real answer is probably as mundane as "They are the core of US power projection and intelligence gathering in the middle east, and we really don't want to lose that level of influence in the region".
-
I mean, it's a highly visible strategic military position. I'm sure that American can technically give it up, but it's a huge cost.
US is global military hegemon, no matter how many civ games might make one think they have a cultural victory.
The US is when you've dominated the map militarily, neuter the other civs instead of sacking them, and then spend the rest of the game uncontested getting the cultural victory for the lulz.
A huge cost for whom?