Why The Economist endorses Kamala Harris
Why The Economist endorses Kamala Harris
The latest news in US politics, with coverage of President Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Democrats, Donald Trump and the Republicans plus daily updates about the 2024 US election.
You're viewing a single thread.
Probably because they've always supported right wing ideology.
My ballot had 3 options: Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and Robert Kennedy, Jr.
Write-ins are not allowed in Indiana.
Who should I have voted for?
Your choices were 3 flavors of right wing. Who you choose on your ballot is up to you.
I've been told for months now by people like yourself that no one should vote for Biden and then for Harris.
Now it's suddenly "it's up to you?"
No one should vote for them, but what you do is your business.
What does not voting at all achieve?
Who said anything about no vote?
Okay then, who should Hoosiers vote for? You said no one should vote for Harris.
That leaves Trump, Oliver and Kennedy.
Which of those three should no one vote for as well? Let's do a process of elimination here and take it step by step.
I assume Kennedy is not an option here since he dropped out already, but he's still on the ballot. Obviously, that's essentially not voting and you're suggesting that not voting is not a good choice.
So, that leaves Trump, the Republican and Oliver, the Libertarian.
Should no one vote for Trump?
No one should vote for Trump either. They are both garbage legislating for the benefit of the wealthy
"I will never, ever, EVER explicitly make a claim for a course of action, because then you'll be able to refute my decision as stupid.
Instead I just want to hold my nose in the air over all of you sheeple and criticize and shame you for EVERY action, shaking my head and smirking like some kind of disingenous gaslighting machine. Happy Election Day!"
Congratulations on this important revelation, do you want a cookie?
Wow such edge