So we've got an entirely flat surface that also happens to be the exact same length as the earth's surface.
If you had one continuous piece of string that went from one end of that flat surface to the other, and on one end there was attached a bell... would you be able to ring the bell by pulling on the other end of string?
Earth's diameter is 41.804 million feet. I'm not sure if you meant that or Earth's circumference when you said "Earth's surface", but I figure either one is gonna get us a really big number.
The first result I can find for string comes in a pack that weighs 2.89oz and contains 328 feet of string.
Using that as our standard, you would need 127,452 packs of string (assuming you find a way to perfectly attach them without wasting any length on knots).
So if we ignore the string stretching, compressing, or breaking, you'd only need to be able to pull 11ish tons of string to ring the bell!
EDIT:
Just for fun: Assuming the motion of the string travels at the speed of sound (I have no idea if it actually would, it just sounds right), there would be about 10.5 hours between you pulling the string and the bell ringing on the other side.
Just for fun: Assuming the motion of the string travels at the speed of sound (I have no idea if it actually would, it just sounds right)
It is true in principle. But the speed of sound is different, depending on the material. For that string we can assume it to be roughly 10 times faster than in the air.
would be about 10.5 hours between you pulling the string and the bell ringing
Compression and expansion is real. The first part of the string moves with your hand, at the same speed as your hand moves. But then it takes some time until further parts of the string - or the final part of the string - even start with their motion. Ok? And here we were talking about how fast this "beginning of the motion" travels forward through the string. That's the speed of sound.
Okay, but what if there is no compression or expansion? What if it's a rigid string already stretched out just enough to be expanded completely but not enough to move the bell? Or maybe a thin wire of the same weight?
Physics. The force you place on that string will effect the far end only at a rate no sooner than the speed of sound thru said medium.
The speed of sound in metal is about 17000 feet per second. Of materials on earth it has some of the fastest rates of transfer. But if you had a metal rod 17000 feet long and pushed one end a foot, the other end wouldn't move a foot till a second later. It will compress.
Interestingly a neutron star has material that is so densely compacted that the speed of sound thru that material is approaching that of the speed of light.
When you want to lift it up vertically, then the force that you need is exactly the same as the weight.
But when you push or pull it forward on a surface, you need a different force.
Push a golf ball on the table: you need very small force, much less than it's weight. Suck the same golf ball through a garden hose: you need much more force.
You want to look up "coefficient of friction" in your books.
It kind of is. That is still 11 tons of mass. To ring a bell, you need to create some velocity on the striker. Pull a 11 ton mass in a frictionless environment will result in an extremely slow rate of acceleration. But in the spirit of the post, I suspect they are not considering how hard they are ringing the bell.
You are technically right though. Even blowing on a string long enough and you could accelerate it up to speeds approaching that of light. Providing there is no friction.