Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WS
wscholermann @aussie.zone
Posts 2
Comments 1.3K
Daily Discussion Thread: 🐔🐣🐤 🏚️ 💀 🦦 Sunday, July 07, 2024
  • Here's an example. One person I know has a husband that smokes and has no intention of quitting, and now their children also smoke.

    I wouldn't even get into a relationship with a smoker to begin with because for me that's a deal breaker. Same with any other substance abuse problem.

  • Daily Discussion Thread: 🐔🐣🐤 🏚️ 💀 🦦 Sunday, July 07, 2024
  • I see a lot of partnered people making some big compromises for various reasons...for the kids, for finances, because they are scared to be "alone".

    At this point in my life with control over my own space and what I do, it would really have to take someone extraordinary to feel as though they were adding to my life rather than me making big sacrifices.

    And honestly the thought of trying to date in the hope of that elusive someone feels like a very big gamble with poor odds. If you enjoyed dating and meeting new people, the process even though you don't win might be bearable, but I don't really care for it tbh.

  • Daily Discussion Thread: 🍜 Saturday, June 29, 2024
  • I like dogs but the fact is I'm allergic to them. And my allergies to cats are exponentially worse.

    For some reason I've been blessed with a hyperactive immune system. Spring as you can imagine is a real bitch. But I must say my symptoms are not nearly as bad now as they were when I was a kid.

  • Daily Discussion Thread: 🦟 Friday, June 28, 2024
  • I agree with you there was misdirected spending but there was also overreaction.

    To be clear, I'm not anti all restrictions but if you clamp down too hard people will more likely try and break the rules for their own sanity, which leads to more spread and so on it goes.

    Reasonable restrictions which people can more sensibly manage I think would have led to better compliance overall.

    And to put it bluntly, people die and you cannot avoid all death. And obviously people who are sick and/or old are more likely to go down that road whether it's from COVID or even just the flu. At some point you have to accept that a virus cannot be stopped, and have a serious conversation about what you are willing to sacrifice in the future for the present.

    We are now seeing writ large in the form of high interest rates and extreme stress on the health system among other things the consequences of these decisions. You might have saved someone back then, but unfortunately someone will die today from deferred surgery, being stuck in the ER or worse waiting for an ambulance.

  • Daily Discussion Thread: 🦟 Friday, June 28, 2024
  • I don't agree it's unique. We've been down this country road with the Spanish Flu, SARs and many others.

    The correct approach is neither overly reactive or overly relaxed. In the first few months I am sympathetic to strict controls while information was gathered, but beyond that it was clear this was not the black plague. And I don't agree everyone in authority would have copied Victoria's way of doing it throughout the pandemic.

    Take Sweden for example. Sweden's approach while not flawless (particularly in relation to aged care), overall had the best trade off between restrictions and allowing free movement. Furthermore their excess death rate was amongst the lowest in Europe.

    https://theconversation.com/did-swedens-controversial-covid-strategy-pay-off-in-many-ways-it-did-but-it-let-the-elderly-down-188338

    You must understand that all that the excessive money spent then purportedly saving lives will cost lives in the present through delayed surgery, excessive wait times in ER (we are talking 48 hrs plus here), and ambulance ramping and wait times. And we are not just talking about hospital spending here but also all kinds of other spending that went on during those two years. Has anyone sat down and had a hard look at the books and looked at everything spent? I can guarantee you there would have been some absolutely mind boggling stupid things.

    One example is the 100 million spent on air purifiers in schools with all most no evidence they would have made a material difference, and certainly no review has taken place afterwards. 100 million. Let that sink in. That could be spent on hospitals now.

    https://archive.is/2023.06.13-120817/https://www.smh.com.au/national/victoria-spent-100m-on-school-air-purifiers-we-don-t-know-if-they-worked-20230613-p5dg2z.html

    There's no free lunch here. Someone will have to pay eventually and not just in dollars but also in lives.

  • www.9news.com.au The cost of an Australian passport is going up next year

    Australian Treasury: Australians will soon have to pay more for their passports following the government's ...

    The cost of an Australian passport is going up next year
    11