I believe it was implemented during covid when everything was weird and then they agreed to just keep it officially.

In North Carolina it's illegal.

So why do women who doomed this country still get to enjoy the finer things?

It's not like women turned out in droves for Harris either. Who's going to withhold from the women that dropped the ball?

I have no idea, but if there is such a rule, it doesn't matter when the car costs this much. Rich people are gonna do rich things.

Because it would be more complicated to develop US only and EU only variants. Speaking from direct professional experience.

And how would you describe a wired keyboard or web cam with a hard wired connection to the device and only a USB-A end?

Your nitpick is not warranted. He never said charge with A.

New Jersey is glaringly bad

Well, then maybe we will be cured of the republican problem when boomers die and younger conservatives sacrifice their children to their emperor via antivaxxing.

Nature always finds a way.

Very few manufacturing facilities for the US would not also carry European approval. Generally speaking you can expect the medication to be as safe as it was before.

Obviously some firms perform better than others at inspections and not all drugs are in all markets... But it won't be the wild west.

Imagine you're a deer bear. You're prancing along, you get thirsty, you spot a little brook, you put your little deer bear lips down to the cool clear water... BAM! A fuckin bullet rips off part of your head!

Originally started typing something to a completely different post. Whoops.

But yes, that becomes the challenge when deciding to stake employees versus a simple profit share.

Staking employees gives them longer term incentives, whereas profit sharing will be fundamentally a sales commission.

Sovereign wealth funds already exist, this isn't a new concept. Only bail out companies that can be profitable, and it will pay for its own administrative costs.... Especially when the company cuts those fat dividends checks

I naturally draw a distinction between city employees and elected officials.

I'm sort of the school of thought that transparency of who they are and conflicts of interest should be a given. Release of tax returns, etc.

I believe it happened before. He was on the outs, but it was the death knell.

Vesting periods, increasing stake over time, and conditions that shares are sold back to the company upon exit. You'd need to figure out how the valuation is done.

Basically turns out into a bonus with deferred payment and a chance for growth of the bonus if they work hard to support company growth.

Why are we worried about doxxing elected officials? Shouldn't they self-doxx as a matter of principle?

Or Radical Christian Terrorists

Exactly

Still doesn't feel good to get fired and get an unemployment check with all sort of conditions attached, just because some company decided to clean up operations after hiring way too much.

Non sequitur to my point, but to what you wrote... I would support that any bailouts come with the condition that 50%+ of the share capital is given to a Sovereign Fund. There should be no corporate welfare... Only investment opportunities.