Skip Navigation
winterschon đź’ž eva đź’ž @mastodon.bsd.cafe

Principal Systems Architect ╰─» baremetal HPC/HFT infra ╰─» perf/quant/analytics

Stateful Resilience ╰─» Flatlined survivor of 'Global Cerebral Ischemia' ╰─» Perpetually Patient Patient in Remission

Engineering Preferences ╰─» #FreeBSD #BSDs #Linux ╰─» #ARM64 #PPC64 #POWER9 #RISCV ╰─» Enterprise #HomeLab + #EmbeddedSystems

Ancestry & Genetics ╰─» Ashkenazim, Prussian, Belarusian ╰─» Americans, Germans, Israelis

Posts 1
Comments 1
🤍 Appeal to the Browser Goddesses 🤍
  • @[email protected] ooh fun, let's play blame the messenger! great solution.

  • 🤍 Appeal to the Browser Goddesses 🤍
  • @[email protected] @[email protected] yes! I was just mentioning that in another response. love gemini, still need to setup a server. 🤩

  • 🤍 Appeal to the Browser Goddesses 🤍
  • @[email protected] @[email protected] that's a great page. reminds me of a purposeful design choice from the Gemini protocol project; it's all text for similar reasons.

    https://geminiprotocol.net/docs/faq-section-4.gmi

  • Firefox @fedia.io đź’ž eva đź’ž @mastodon.bsd.cafe

    🤍 Appeal to the Browser Goddesses 🤍

    🤍 Appeal to the Browser Goddesses 🤍

    Can we please make it a thing where 32GB of RAM isn't an insufficient amount for day to day web browser usage? Getting an OOM core dump for that reason is inexcusable.

    • Should the Zoom browser app really need 2GB on a single tab when it's already downscaling a 1080p feed to 320p on an enterprise account?
    • Should Amazon's website really need 1GB per tab just to view the cart or a ~800Mb for a single simple product page?
    • Please remind me how an MKdocs fully static page with a single 400k image and no datatables or fancy JS somehow require 242Mb?
    • Or perhaps shed some light on the requirement where Google's main page with a single search form somehow needs ~500Mb

    There are no "good reasons" for these inefficiencies. We don't suddenly have better search fields or compressed jpegs now vs a decade ago with 1/10th of the system resources.

    #developer #webdev #linux #browsers #chrome #firefox #ensh11n

    17
    Perhaps one day the internal browser wars will subside, my transit history will persist a single cache, my settings and extensions and preferences will export to a single file...
  • @[email protected] Brave is awesome overall, and at present their sync chain method has been nearly impervious to split-brain conflicts across multiple devices.

    Otter browser is ultra minimalist approach, has almost no chrome or aesthetics to alter, which is a benefit and detriment depending on use case. I like using it for single window admin apps (iKVM, iDRAC, PiKVM, etc) due to the lower resource load.

  • ICANN approves use of .internal domain for your network
  • @JackbyDev Why would that be a question at all? Buy a domain name and take care of your dns records.

    that's an odd way to say that you don't own any domains. that's step one, but does it even need to be said?

  • ICANN approves use of .internal domain for your network
  • @solrize @thehatfox get a free wildcard cert for your domain and use it just like any other. nothing new, nothing different. I have those running on LAN-only hosts behind a firewall and NAT with no port punching or UpNP or any ingress possible.

    if you don't want to run a private CA with automated cert distribution (also simple with ansible or a few tens of LOC in shell or python), the LetsEncrypt is trivial and costs nothing -- still requires one to load the cert and key onto a server though, which is 2/3 of the work vs private CA cert management.