I want to be constructive so:

Please consider the unintentional disinformation people create when they try to sound like they know what they are talking about. Contributing to discussion is difficult on complex topics.

Its perfectly natural to want to continue a conversation to the point where you might fill in some details instead of researching a topic or not responding. But this is seriously harmful in the age of disinformation. Theres plenty i dont know. But there are tools expressly created to identify ai content to avoid using it in model training. The consequence of using synthetic data is the only topic in the article you are commenting on. Either read the article or please dont feel like you need to come up with a response.

Hey i just wanted to say my condolences for your downvotes and im here if you want to talk

Hey, whats so bad about w11?

Cant blame me for asking :)

Seems like tools to recognize ai content to prevent synthetic input avoids model degredation.

If those tools are up to the task then i would agree it probably doesnt hinder model training. Not sure what the reality is, or if the need for those tools creates a barrier to entry for a significant portion of those trying to create models with internet-crawled data.

By chance, is that based on other peoples succinct social media comments on ai?

For sure for sure. This study was conducted on a thousand republican and democratic households and means fuck all.

Not even worth considering. The only thing this study is good for is allowing someone to make an article with an outrageously misleading headline to bait polarized keyboard warriors to further waste their life.

Kind of like how true thoughts and opinions on complex topics are boiled down to digestible concepts for others to understand who then perpetuate those concepts without understanding them and the meaning degrades and we dont think anymore, just repeat stuff in social media comments.

Side note... this article sucks and seems like it was ai generated. Repetitive and no author credit? Just says it was originally posted elsewhere.

Generative AI isnt in danger of being killed as this clickbait titled suggests... just hindered.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoolander

Idk why we need to say we are certain about someones intention. It could just be a mental stability thing, like many people have problems with. His tweets are just far more consequential than a regular persons. He might not be as strongly shaped by social norms due to his fortunate circumstance.

(Im not defending anything. I just want truth and theres no point in extrapolating the situation further than what we see on the surface... just punish him according to what he did, or become a journalist and get relevant details to judge him further)

There needs to be voluntary continuing education for adults and parents in the information age. Our social norms are strong, and people will largely self regulate if they are educated about consequences of their actions. There needs to be public education curriculum changes for kids that are focused on functioning in adulthood.

We dont need a law for everything. Parents have always been able to make decisions for their children even if it seems wrong to other people, within reason.

Vr optimized fantasy racing with wheel support is fucking exactly what we need. So many sim racers want to play something a little more casual and fun.

.... it has wheel support right?

Edit: vr only is a little odd to me if it targets sim racers.

Dude no lighthouse sensors? God damn it. I just want to get rid of my g2 so i dont need to calibrate my index controllers constantly. I mean it looks fine otherwise i guess. The price tag is a huge miss though. Why would i pay that much for lcd, after-thought controller design? Eye tracking is not justification. And it should probably be smaller at this stage of new hardware.

Why does htc so consistently disappoint? Maybe im missing something...

Edit: the auto physical ipd adjustment is pretty dope.

Some people just want to hate on trump and hate on people who we percieve to be standing for the wrong things in the world and that makes sense to me. If you are just joking around on here then i get that.

I would say if you are trying to have an end goal like getting other people to agree with you about hating trump then i think its really important to not lie to reach that goal, or use disinformation to reach that goal. I dont think you are lying when you say you believe a trumper made it, for example, but assuming what you see is true because an ally posted it, is very possibly passing on disinformation and its effects can be just as bad.

If both sides are lying or using disinformation then i personally wouldnt know what to think about who is right. I think its really important to seek truth first, and then base our arguments on that... even if the other side is quicker to respond with lies, or is more convincing with lies.

Just be honest and dont be afraid to ask dumb questions so your opinions are built on a foundation thats real above all else. The idiots are those pretending to be experts and causing mass confusion, no matter what political stance.

Thats my thoughts on the current state of social media and stuff.

When a random image/text makes a claim, such as saying trump tried to pass off an ai generated image of himself as real, you might consider its not true.

Just because trump might not be someone i would trust, doesnt mean i should trust anything and everything that insults him, especially when that thing is nothing more than a jpeg with no information about where it came from.

So, in order to be a good participant of the internet, and to help avoid the perpetuation of disinformation, i would want to ask if the image has merit before accidentally forming some opinion on the matter. Or maybe even independently try to verify if its true through other sources. So far, nobody has been able to verify anything that suggests i should believe trump did this. So i think i wont be believing anything like this happened (yet).

Edit: and sorry for coming off as condescending in my first comment. I could have just been more straight forward with you instead of trying to comment something that i expected to be upvoted more. I really kind of caved to the karma system and the social pressure it creates.

Edited because i was being an asshole: To me it seems like this post isnt true, and is a meme meant to get upvotes and be funny.

Probably not. This post seems to want to imply that without making the claim directly. Just as disingenuous as what they are implying happened.

Thanks for commenting. We should be seeking truth.

When both sides discredit themselves then there is no truth anymore... just mass confusion. Im so sick of this disinformation age.

Edit: sorry to stalk your account but the objective nature of your comments on lemmy is a force for good. Seriously thanks for your efforts.

You arent alone. Thanks for typing it out.

This is wrong. Stop.

Yeah but glad is a feeling you have, not something that makes you try to create a narrative or change reality. Its concerning. Please fix everyone naught.