@Zachariah @youngalfred It was (silly) me, n++ please

@Bro666 But I confirmed that was sarcasm, sorry again. I definitely need to learn more English more.

@Bro666 I have the same feeling :) Sorry to bother you. What I saw is here from youngalfred https://lemm.ee/comment/17751217 and OP re-posted it. I was just concerned that it was an endorsement.

@[email protected] @[email protected] Cf https://www.fsf.org/licensing/copilot/on-the-nature-of-ai-code-copilots

@[email protected] @[email protected] Can you continue to focus on these developments and less and less on AI?
I think it is wrong to think nothing of free software code distributed under the GPL being included in AI generated results without regard to its license.

@[email protected] @tertle950 @[email protected] Maybe what I know was outdated, sorry for that. Apple already refers GPL as "FOSS" in their licence, and they probably don't intend to ban everything. Interesting.
- https://developer.apple.com/support/terms/apple-developer-program-license-agreement/
- https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/722101

@[email protected] @tertle950 @[email protected] Wow, I didn't know that GPL-licensed software can be uploded to Apple's AppStore and developers can use it.