They still make a percentage of each transaction. But it sure isn't 18% interest

This is bad advice inside a Walmart

If they're swiping failed QA chips, it's easy to swipe a couple boxes at the same time.

I always thought it was "Bring 'em young" and referred to pedophiles.

I guess I wasn't too far off.

Human beings don't require a data feed to survive.

The hell I don't. I am NOT putting up with reality for that long, ESPECIALLY in a Walmart.

Okay, so you do want an FBI, just with a few more restrictions. I didn't get that from your original post.

I'm not saying they're effective, but the FBI is one of the few organizations that can investigate corrupt police forces. How would we address that?

You're telling on yourself.

But it's ok. Lean into it. Embrace your furry side.

Typically being a 90s kid means you experienced the 90s during your formative years. Not that you were born then.

The only thing that can stop a toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun

Ok, so you think both are equally bad. That's fine.

I personally disagree, but that's because I worry for my daughters and gay friends.

I get the fervor for wanting to kill child rapists. I just wish we could carry that same fervor for adult rapists too.

We have a first past the post-voting system and two major parties. You never vote FOR anyone. You only vote AGAINST who you hate more.

Voting third party or not voting is exactly equivalent to voting for whoever you hate most of the top two candidates.

The things I just said are facts. Logically proven. Look up CPG Grey's FPTP video if you want an easy primer.

So then the question just remains, do you think both candidates are equally horrible? If the answer is yes, then your strategy is correct. But if you think one of the two is slightly more horrible, that's the one you should be voting against.

Decisions should be made by whomever or whatever is most effective. That's not even a debate. If the tarot cards were right more often than the judge, fire the judge and get me a deck. Because the judge is clearly ineffective.

You can't privilege an approach just because it sounds more reasonable. It also has to BE more reasonable. It's crazy to say "I'm happy being wrong because I'm more comfortable with the process"

The trick of course is to find fair ways to measure effectiveness accurately and make sure it's repeatable. That's a rabbit hole of challenges.

Boofing the shallot

I just want to chime in and say thank you for editing your post after finding new information. If everyone in the world was like you, this place would suck a lot less.

It's good money if you can get it. It's basically mental and physical therapy to address pathological loneliness.

Too bad Medicare doesn't cover it. Thanks Obama.

But I use arch

I wish cars came in more interesting colors. I'd go magenta.

Empathy and anthropomorphization. It's a good quality to have as a person, but it does cause these false positive triggers.