It’s always been troubled. But it still is likely quite safe to return home in. Even the article admits there is only speculation about using a different vehicle to bring them home. No official word suggests that might be the case.

Not so much a dunk on historical texts as it is on people who believe that something written thousands of years ago is somehow infallible.

God just threw the universe together, but Einstein took the time to understand it.

Alternatively, the Bible has an extremely naive (and often counterfactual) understanding of natural science. If the world really was created by an all-knowing God and His word revealed in “inerrant” holy scripture, you’d expect it to be a whole lot better at matching the science.

That’s correct, and the paper supports this. But people don’t want to believe it’s true so they keep propagating this myth.

Training on AI outputs is fine as long as you filter the outputs to only things you want to see.

The pink works, no need to minimize it.

Now do it per capita

Ehhh, it’s closer than you think. People in the Middle East hated Americans for the decades of war we brought to their land. We killed their brothers, uncles, fathers, children, etc. - it’s not hard to understand how that might cause extremist attitudes against the US. Please don’t forget or whitewash the horrible things America has done.

Palestinians hated Israel for all the same reasons, (plus several more).

In addition, a terrorist act against civilians was the instigation of both events, leading to a one-sided war obliterating the offending nation.

This in no way excuses Israel for what they are doing. Killing and starving civilians is wrong, and only serves to embolden the extremists. We know because that’s what happened to the US.

Not quite Felis Catus, not quite Homo Sapiens. Possibly Felis Sapiens or Homo Catus though.

Slay the Princess is a delight! Uh, in a way.

I try to keep things simple by only using GGG or PPP.

You cannot choose a world without AI. They will get built regardless of what you want.

With that in mind, the optimal (least bad) outcome is that your world views are represented in the dataset.

If only you had chosen the slightly-less-fat spliff we would have all survived…

We’re not even sure Johnny could read.

Half foot Senshi has seen some shit.

The worry is not that you can change the future, it’s that you can’t predict what large change your small action will make. Be careful, literally anything you do might doom the human race!

You’re trying to find maliciousness where there’s only incompetence.

Your Lemmy posts are already being scraped for AI

Good, hopefully it’ll make AI that is slightly less toxic than the rest of the internet.

It always baffles me that people don’t want their content represented in an AI - every word you write that gets indexed is a vote for how future AI will behave.

Rich people are counterintuitively more susceptible to bribery.

Reportedly it hit a residential building. That’s a big problem.

It’s important to respond to (some) bad faith arguments, not for the sake of the one making that argument, but for observers who might still be on the fence.