couldn’t people just stalk without being logged in?
Yes, you can. That's why it was even dumber. It's super weird to me that anyone could be mad about this.
That's how blocking and banning on the internet has always worked. When you block someone they just can't reply to you. The way it was until now is just weird. Why would blocking an account prevent them from viewing your public posts!? "Stalkers" can always just make another account. I am glad they are actually fixing blocking on Twitter. g
Slang is slang. It's always used verbally. I am not sure why someone would expect a llm to generate proper slang. Not sure at all how stating that fact makes one a "bigot".
" “things that just work”.
That certainly not how I will describe the Linux desktop experience.
Because there is no such thing as "African American English". There is proper English and then there is slang.
Banning TikTok never had anything to do with "protecting your data".
Seniors should not be allowed to drive.
Of course it can. There is nothing subjective about bad directing, bad acting, and bad writing. Fools who claim everything is subjective and "every idea is a good idea" are the reason we get shit TV and movies like the Acolyte and Kenobi.
I've been using Youtube basically since it exists. There were no ads in the beginning. I've also always been using adblockers. I was surprised when I heard people say they have to wait for ads on youtube. I was like "What? Youtube has ads!?".
That speaks more to your lack of taste than the show's quality. The show was laughingly bad. From acting, to directing, even the special effects.
I am not sure there was any real "incel review bombing". Looks more like an excuse of the show's creators. The show was shockingly bad, even from a purely technical standpoint. It felt like a not very good fanfiction. The Kenobi show was the same.
Why do people call the internet connection "the wifi" now?