Money laundering is a real issue so I understand why they would like to do something like this. Having read through the comments here I can see that a lot of people are opposed but I don't really get why.
Oh I fully agree that not eating meat is the better alternative. I just thing the meme was stupid. There's plenty of valid reasons to promote eating less meat without making up strawmen
What's your problem with that? I'm not into it myself but I can't see how it's any different from eating meat in the first place
We need to eat. We don't need tol take joy in aninal deaths. These are different things and the meme is dumb.
Clearly, enforcement is the weak part of international law.
Soooooo surprised to find Israel working against the international community thou :-)
Yeah I expect climate change scientists would roll their eyes pretty hard at my post as well =)
Just wait, Netanyahu will move the chains again
One of the painful things about having studied philosophy is experiencing the fact that nearly everyone on the Internet are absolutely sure having read a few paragraphs about the topic makes them an expert.
Huh. Trump is an LLM. Wrong much of the time but 100% confident about it
Why the fuck does the writer think that state actors weren't already aware of these vectors?
Ah well again, that's a different claim. The court is respected but everyone knows they have no enforcement powers. Their strength is entirely diplomatic
My chocolate is fair trade actually. You can find good options. Although, yeah, I'd probably struggle re clothing
Nodding my head with samsung. HP comes up and I'm ohhhh how did I forget them!
Samsung. & Vodafone. For NZrs: Fisher & Pykel.
F&P quality is shit and the first two have awful customer service. Samsung also, while they do innovate, lack quality and don't stick by their products.
Also: HP and Apple. Shitty lock-in tactics
"not in a highly refined form"
If you've shifted your claim to "Israel doesn't respect the ICJ" then yeah of course, they clearly have no respect for international law but that is a very different claim to what you posted earlier