Ownership pie chart

!

Ownership table

!

images source

!

!

On May 17 GameStop announced plans to sell up to 45 million shares, and on May 24th they announced that all 45 million shares were sold for $933 million, at an average price of about $20.73.

Modifying shares outstanding from 306 million to 351 million is an approximately 15% dilution. A shareholder could have expected the value of their own share holdings to have dropped 15% from this action, but shareholder value hardly went down at all as a consequence of the dilution and in fact is up about 75% from May 1 to May 24.

was trying to post something to r/GME and had used a page on the DRSGME.org website as a source.

Specifically, it was the 2023 stockholder list viewing page that I had wanted to use a source because it is a good source. It is pretty much the only source of data that GME shareholders have that provide numbers about DRS versus DSPP. An imperfect, out-of-date set of data, sure, but it's all we've got.

Turns out, r/GME will not allow any linking to DRSGME.org.

Why would that be?

A free information website built by GME shareholders for other GME shareholders and anyone else, is not permitted in the r/GME subreddit. Huh?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/1495550

> May 24, 2024 > > GRAPEVINE, Texas, May 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- GameStop Corp. (NYSE: GME) (“GameStop” or the “Company”) today announced that it has completed its previously disclosed “at-the-market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”). > > GameStop disclosed on May 17, 2024 that it filed a prospectus supplement with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission to offer and sell up to a maximum amount of 45,000,000 shares of its common stock from time to time through the ATM Program. The Company sold the maximum number of shares registered under the ATM Program for aggregate gross proceeds (before commissions and offering expenses) of approximately $933.4 million. > > GameStop intends to use the net proceeds from the ATM Program for general corporate purposes, which may include acquisitions and investments. >

!

!

source: gmetimeline.org/ownership

image source

"Held at" DTC versus Computershare

As of March 20, 2024 there were 305,873,200 shares of GameStop's Class A common stock (GME) outstanding.

"Of those outstanding shares, approximately 230.6 million were held by Cede & Co on behalf of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (or approximately 75% of our outstanding shares) and approximately 75.3 million shares of our Class A common stock were held by registered holders with our transfer agent (or approximately 25% of our outstanding shares)."

• 25% of issued shares of GME are owned by directly registered shareholders

• The other 75% is held by Cede & Co on behalf of the DTCC

As of May 24, 2024, GameStop completed an at the market equity offering, and sold 45,000,000 shares, increasing the total amount of shares outstanding to approximately 351,000,000.

DRS vs DSPP

Information about DRS versus DSPP counts held at Computershare are not reported publicly.

This information is available, however, on the GameStop stockholder list which can be viewed in person at GameStop headquarters.

The latest data we have was from 2023 when GME shareholders viewed the stockholder list and obtained some data including DRS vs DSPP counts. Source: https://www.drsgme.org/2023-stock-list-viewing

The DRS vs DSPP numbers in the graphic have been rounded for simplicity based off the data from that 2023 source.

Of shares held by Computershare: 53 million DRS, 22 million DSPP.

May 24, 2024

GRAPEVINE, Texas, May 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- GameStop Corp. (NYSE: GME) (“GameStop” or the “Company”) today announced that it has completed its previously disclosed “at-the-market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”).

GameStop disclosed on May 17, 2024 that it filed a prospectus supplement with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission to offer and sell up to a maximum amount of 45,000,000 shares of its common stock from time to time through the ATM Program. The Company sold the maximum number of shares registered under the ATM Program for aggregate gross proceeds (before commissions and offering expenses) of approximately $933.4 million.

GameStop intends to use the net proceeds from the ATM Program for general corporate purposes, which may include acquisitions and investments.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/1455429

----

when superstonk isn't a problem, Reddit is.

Apparently, with no warning or justification, prominent superstonk poster of many years was spontaneously banned after having written this post titled: We’re Not In MOASS Territory (yet)

Noticed this post on reddit, decided to give this >40 minute documentary a watch.

A review of GAMESTOP to the MOON - How Reddit almost triggered an Economic Crisis | FD Finance

★★☆☆☆

2/5, would not recommend.

TLDR: documentary focuses primarily on the events of late 2020 and early 2021, conflates AMC and GME as equivalent things, concludes with the insinuation that all AMC, GME, and NFT investors are losers that have lost almost everything

----

• Title of the documentary does not match the content of the documentary. A more appropriate title might have been "the story of Reddit day traders pumping AMC and GME." That is what this documentary was about.

• paints most of these investors as either foolish day traders or naive investors, uses words like "gambling", "casino"

• lots of FUD sentiment throughout

• a few of these investors made a lots of money while most investors were losers

• 32:04 "GameStop led the way. And, as a group, the totality of the group picked AMC next. And, it wasn't like somebody said oh man we're all gonna go over to AMC, it's just kind of you know, that's where the flow goes, that's where the chatter goes, and AMC was the next stock."

• for some reason, out of nowhere, in the final 5 minutes the documentary suddenly starts talking about NFTs and makes them out to be pointless. Doesn't mention GameStop's relationship with NFTs but in stead focuses on how NFTs were a speculative bubble with foolish investors, just like with AMC and GME.

Total waste of time. I don't know who the intended audience was for this, but this is just more pointless narrating about the lives of people that experienced events that happened 3 years ago, concluding that the story is over and all those people that didn't get out with gains are losers that are never going to win.

It's as if the media like this is stuck in the year 2021. Reddit. Wallstreetbets. AMC. GameStop. Day traders. Robinhood. Down 90% since peak. The end.

GameStop was profitable for the first time in 6 years

GameStop reported full-year profitability for fiscal year 2023, contradicting the prevailing media sentiment that GameStop is a terrible company destined for bankruptcy

Summary

• On March 26, 2024, GameStop released financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended February 3, 2024, demonstrating small but not insignificant full-year profits for the first time in 6 years, despite reduced revenues. "Net income was $6.7 million for fiscal year 2023, compared to a net loss of $313.1 million for fiscal year 2022."
• Sentiment of GameStop found in financial media continues to be negative, dishonest, and cynical, despite the undeniable but often ignored improvements to the fundamentals of the company that have been achieved by the new management team. In most cases, the fact that GameStop was profitable for the first time in 6 years is not even mentioned at all.

Historical context

From a historical point of view, GameStop was consistently profitable every fiscal year from 2005 through 2016, with the exception of 2012. Starting in fiscal year 2017, GameStop began showing reduced profitability, and from FY 2018 through FY 2022, was unprofitable.

!

Source: GameStop 10-K filings - Google Sheets

Looking exclusively at revenue, it is clear that there has been a significant reduction starting approximately with fiscal year 2019. Much of this can be attributed to the fact that gamers are increasingly buying games digitally rather than in the form of physical discs such as can be purchased at a brick-and-mortar retail store like GameStop.

Yet, even in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, it is clear that despite high revenues the company was not performing well.

Heading through 2020, GameStop was undeniably a struggling company facing significant challenges, and according to many was destined for bankruptcy. The trading price of GME reflected this prevailing sentiment, and the financial media was dutifully critical.

Company turnaround

In 2020, activist investor Ryan Cohen began purchasing shares of GME, ultimately becoming the largest individual owner of the company with approximately 12% ownership. By June 2021, the entire board of directors of the company was replaced by Ryan Cohen and his associates, with Ryan Cohen becoming chairman of the board. From this time onward, control of the company was completely in the hands of this new leadership team.

>"We inherited a bunch of legacy everything, and under-investment across the entire business –- people, the entire technology stack, just decades of neglect, and so it’s hard to turn around a brick and mortar retailer that’s under the kind of pressure that GameStop was and continues to be under, but that was also part of the attraction going into GameStop was that a transformation the likes of GameStop was really unprecedented and I was motivated by that."

• Ryan Cohen, November 2022

The company went from a situation where it was losing hundreds of millions of dollars per year to net profitability in fiscal year 2023.

While this is an undeniably positive result for the company in this time period, GameStop continues to face numerous challenges and must continue to improve and adapt in order to successfully compete in the modern video game industry.

Media sentiment

What does mainstream financial media have to say about GameStop achieving full-year profitability for the first time in 6 years?

• GameStop faces 'unsustainable' sales decline, cuts jobs to control costs

  • Focuses on job cuts, reduced revenue, leans on the opinion of Michael Pachter
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Q4 Earnings Highlights: Retail Favorite Stock Plunges After Revenue, EPS Miss

  • Emphasis on GME share price going down
  • Focuses on reduced revenue
  • Did mention some favorable facts
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Stock Plummets Following Q4: Profitability Fails to Offset Significant Revenue Miss

  • Headline emphasizes GME share price is down
  • Makes clear that GameStop achieved full-year profitability for the first time in years
  • Generally fair reporting of other facts

• GameStop Stock Plunges After Earnings Fall Short of Expectations—Key Level to Watch

  • Headline emphasizes GME share price is down, 'expectations' were missed
  • Focus on job cuts, reduced revenue
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• Jim Cramer Says GameStop Is Arguably The Worst Company In America

  • Article is entirely negative, leans on the opinions of Jim Cramer and Michael Pachter
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Q4 Earnings Smash Wall Street Expectations: Reports Profitability For First Time In Over Half A Decade

  • Makes clear and emphasizes contextual significance of GameStop's full-year profitability
  • Generally positive about GameStop's financial circumstances

• GameStop could be gone in less than 5 years, says analyst

  • Article is almost entirely negative, leans on the opinions of Michael Pachter
  • Does mention GameStop's positive cash holdings of $1.2 billion
  • Claims that Reddit's WallStreetBets has 'seemingly walked away from the “stonk”', fails to mention that GME discussion is censored on WallStreetBets (formally banned by the moderators in 2022), fails to mention that GME shareholders are found in different online communities
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Needs To Get Its Game Back

  • Focuses on reduced revenue, job cuts
  • Weak mention of GameStop posting a full-year profit of $6.7 million
  • Generally fair assessment of the struggles faced by GameStop

• GameStop Confirms More Layoffs, Share Price Tumbles After Sales Slide

  • Headline emphasizes job cuts, GME share price is down
  • Generally neutral article
  • Does mention GameStop's full-year profitability

• A Sales Slump Is the Kiss of Death for GameStop Stock

  • Entirely negative article, leans on the opinion of Michael Pachter
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability
  • 'If you value your wealth, just stay away from GameStop stock.'

• GameStop saga ends. Winner: capital markets

  • Entirely negative article, leans on the opinion of Michael Pachter
  • Focuses on GME share price being down
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability
  • 'In this case, “shorts” were right... The meme army may have lost, but perhaps next time will be clearer-eyed.'

• GameStop Stock: Is This The End of a Saga Or Just Another Chapter?

  • Despite any sentiment implied by the headline, this article provides a mostly neutral assessment of GameStop's circumstances
  • Mentions GameStop achieving full-year profitability

Searching for recent news about GameStop yields mostly negative sentiment that fails to even mention at all that GameStop achieved full-year profitability for the first time in 6 years.

Failing to mention this important detail is a deliberate decision that reveals a clear bias in the media. It goes beyond just reporting about true negative facts about GameStop. It demonstrates a deliberate effort, by those culpable writers and media outlets, to propagate a specific sentiment about the company that is not allowed to even mention contextually important true positive facts about the company.

GameStop was profitable for the first time in 6 years - this is the news headline that captures the significance of GameStop's recent earnings report. Yet, an unassuming person who consumes mainstream financial media likely would not even learn about this important fact at all.

Who would benefit from that?

Ongoing financial conflict

Why are there competing, mutually exclusive narratives?

There are competing narratives because there are competing financial interests.

One of the listed news articles, GameStop saga ends. Winner: capital markets, from Reuters, draws some attention to this ongoing conflict while declaring that the conflict is actually over and one side has won and one side has lost.

GME shareholders that believe in the company turnaround and leadership, despite the real challenges faced by GameStop, have a vested financial interest in the success of the company, with a desire for the share price of GME to go up, and naturally will promote the narrative that supports this financial interest.

In opposition to GME shareholders are all of the financial market participants that have a vested financial interest in the share price of GME going down. An example of such a participant would be any hedge fund that has a net short position on GME. The article refers to this faction as "shorts", recogonizing that such a faction with an interest does exist. Naturally, members of this faction will promote the narrative that supports their financial interest.

If the prospect of GameStop's success was not an ongoing threat to one faction of incumbent market participants, then there would be no reason to deliberately omit the fact of GameStop's profitability, to pretend that it isn't something that even happened at all.

Recognizing that there is an ongoing financial competition between factions that stand to benefit financially from a particular outcome of the GME share price, which faction benefits when most mainstream financial media articles propagate negative sentiment about GameStop and deliberately ignore the contextually significant fact that GameStop was profitable?

It is clear: much of mainstream financial media is actively propagating biased narratives to the benefit of the faction that has a vested financial interest in the share price of GME going down.

An interactive version of this article can be found at gmetimeline.org/fy23-profitability

!

!

!

data source: GameStop 10-K filings - Google Sheets document

Here is another representation of GameStop's FY23 income statement, this time showing clearly that GameStop had an operating loss of $34.5 M ( compared with an operating loss of $311 M FY22 !)

If not for the $49.5 M from interest income, GameStop would not have had positive net earnings in FY23.

Operating loss of $35 M (compared with operating loss of $312 M in FY22)

Small but notable net earnings of $6.7 M (compared with net loss of $313 M in FY22)

How did GameStop make $50 million in interest income?

GameStop was profitable for the first time in 6 years

GameStop reported full-year profitability for fiscal year 2023, contradicting the prevailing media sentiment that GameStop is a terrible company destined for bankruptcy

Summary

• On March 26, 2024, GameStop released financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended February 3, 2024, demonstrating small but not insignificant full-year profits for the first time in 6 years, despite reduced revenues. "Net income was $6.7 million for fiscal year 2023, compared to a net loss of $313.1 million for fiscal year 2022."
• Sentiment of GameStop found in financial media continues to be negative, dishonest, and cynical, despite the undeniable but often ignored improvements to the fundamentals of the company that have been achieved by the new management team. In most cases, the fact that GameStop was profitable for the first time in 6 years is not even mentioned at all.

Historical context

From a historical point of view, GameStop was consistently profitable every fiscal year from 2005 through 2016, with the exception of 2012. Starting in fiscal year 2017, GameStop began showing reduced profitability, and from FY 2018 through FY 2022, was unprofitable.

!

Source: GameStop 10-K filings - Google Sheets

Looking exclusively at revenue, it is clear that there has been a significant reduction starting approximately with fiscal year 2019. Much of this can be attributed to the fact that gamers are increasingly buying games digitally rather than in the form of physical discs such as can be purchased at a brick-and-mortar retail store like GameStop.

Yet, even in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, it is clear that despite high revenues the company was not performing well.

Heading through 2020, GameStop was undeniably a struggling company facing significant challenges, and according to many was destined for bankruptcy. The trading price of GME reflected this prevailing sentiment, and the financial media was dutifully critical.

Company turnaround

In 2020, activist investor Ryan Cohen began purchasing shares of GME, ultimately becoming the largest individual owner of the company with approximately 12% ownership. By June 2021, the entire board of directors of the company was replaced by Ryan Cohen and his associates, with Ryan Cohen becoming chairman of the board. From this time onward, control of the company was completely in the hands of this new leadership team.

>"We inherited a bunch of legacy everything, and under-investment across the entire business –- people, the entire technology stack, just decades of neglect, and so it’s hard to turn around a brick and mortar retailer that’s under the kind of pressure that GameStop was and continues to be under, but that was also part of the attraction going into GameStop was that a transformation the likes of GameStop was really unprecedented and I was motivated by that."

• Ryan Cohen, November 2022

The company went from a situation where it was losing hundreds of millions of dollars per year to net profitability in fiscal year 2023.

While this is an undeniably positive result for the company in this time period, GameStop continues to face numerous challenges and must continue to improve and adapt in order to successfully compete in the modern video game industry.

Media sentiment

What does mainstream financial media have to say about GameStop achieving full-year profitability for the first time in 6 years?

• GameStop faces 'unsustainable' sales decline, cuts jobs to control costs

  • Focuses on job cuts, reduced revenue, leans on the opinion of Michael Pachter
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Q4 Earnings Highlights: Retail Favorite Stock Plunges After Revenue, EPS Miss

  • Emphasis on GME share price going down
  • Focuses on reduced revenue
  • Did mention some favorable facts
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Stock Plummets Following Q4: Profitability Fails to Offset Significant Revenue Miss

  • Headline emphasizes GME share price is down
  • Makes clear that GameStop achieved full-year profitability for the first time in years
  • Generally fair reporting of other facts

• GameStop Stock Plunges After Earnings Fall Short of Expectations—Key Level to Watch

  • Headline emphasizes GME share price is down, 'expectations' were missed
  • Focus on job cuts, reduced revenue
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• Jim Cramer Says GameStop Is Arguably The Worst Company In America

  • Article is entirely negative, leans on the opinions of Jim Cramer and Michael Pachter
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Q4 Earnings Smash Wall Street Expectations: Reports Profitability For First Time In Over Half A Decade

  • Makes clear and emphasizes contextual significance of GameStop's full-year profitability
  • Generally positive about GameStop's financial circumstances

• GameStop could be gone in less than 5 years, says analyst

  • Article is almost entirely negative, leans on the opinions of Michael Pachter
  • Does mention GameStop's positive cash holdings of $1.2 billion
  • Claims that Reddit's WallStreetBets has 'seemingly walked away from the “stonk”', fails to mention that GME discussion is censored on WallStreetBets (formally banned by the moderators in 2022), fails to mention that GME shareholders are found in different online communities
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability

• GameStop Needs To Get Its Game Back

  • Focuses on reduced revenue, job cuts
  • Weak mention of GameStop posting a full-year profit of $6.7 million
  • Generally fair assessment of the struggles faced by GameStop

• GameStop Confirms More Layoffs, Share Price Tumbles After Sales Slide

  • Headline emphasizes job cuts, GME share price is down
  • Generally neutral article
  • Does mention GameStop's full-year profitability

• A Sales Slump Is the Kiss of Death for GameStop Stock

  • Entirely negative article, leans on the opinion of Michael Pachter
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability
  • 'If you value your wealth, just stay away from GameStop stock.'

• GameStop saga ends. Winner: capital markets

  • Entirely negative article, leans on the opinion of Michael Pachter
  • Focuses on GME share price being down
  • Fails to mention GameStop achieving full-year profitability
  • 'In this case, “shorts” were right... The meme army may have lost, but perhaps next time will be clearer-eyed.'

• GameStop Stock: Is This The End of a Saga Or Just Another Chapter?

  • Despite any sentiment implied by the headline, this article provides a mostly neutral assessment of GameStop's circumstances
  • Mentions GameStop achieving full-year profitability

Searching for recent news about GameStop yields mostly negative sentiment that fails to even mention at all that GameStop achieved full-year profitability for the first time in 6 years.

Failing to mention this important detail is a deliberate decision that reveals a clear bias in the media. It goes beyond just reporting about true negative facts about GameStop. It demonstrates a deliberate effort, by those culpable writers and media outlets, to propagate a specific sentiment about the company that is not allowed to even mention contextually important true positive facts about the company.

GameStop was profitable for the first time in 6 years - this is the news headline that captures the significance of GameStop's recent earnings report. Yet, an unassuming person who consumes mainstream financial media likely would not even learn about this important fact at all.

Who would benefit from that?

Ongoing financial conflict

Why are there competing, mutually exclusive narratives?

There are competing narratives because there are competing financial interests.

One of the listed news articles, GameStop saga ends. Winner: capital markets, from Reuters, draws some attention to this ongoing conflict while declaring that the conflict is actually over and one side has won and one side has lost.

GME shareholders that believe in the company turnaround and leadership, despite the real challenges faced by GameStop, have a vested financial interest in the success of the company, with a desire for the share price of GME to go up, and naturally will promote the narrative that supports this financial interest.

In opposition to GME shareholders are all of the financial market participants that have a vested financial interest in the share price of GME going down. An example of such a participant would be any hedge fund that has a net short position on GME. The article refers to this faction as "shorts", recogonizing that such a faction with an interest does exist. Naturally, members of this faction will promote the narrative that supports their financial interest.

If the prospect of GameStop's success was not an ongoing threat to one faction of incumbent market participants, then there would be no reason to deliberately omit the fact of GameStop's profitability, to pretend that it isn't something that even happened at all.

Recognizing that there is an ongoing financial competition between factions that stand to benefit financially from a particular outcome of the GME share price, which faction benefits when most mainstream financial media articles propagate negative sentiment about GameStop and deliberately ignore the contextually significant fact that GameStop was profitable?

It is clear: much of mainstream financial media is actively propagating biased narratives to the benefit of the faction that has a vested financial interest in the share price of GME going down.

An interactive version of this article can be found at gmetimeline.org/fy23-profitability

For the first 3 quarters of FY 2023, GameStop has posted a total net loss of $56.4 million.

Therefore, in order to achieve full-year profitability, GameStop must achieve greater than $56.4 million in net profit for Q4 2023.

This is certainly achievable, though not guaranteed.

Something like a $100 million net gain for Q4 is possible, but not necessarily very likely.

Therefore, in any case of full-year profitability, at best, the PE ratio for GME will almost certainly be above 100, but will more likely be in the several hundreds, or worse.

By comparison, the average PE ratio for S&P500 is around 25.

https://www.macrotrends.net/2577/sp-500-pe-ratio-price-to-earnings-chart

Some PE ratios of other companies:

• Microsoft: 37
• Apple: 26
• Nvidia: 213
• Amazon: 89
• Alphabet: 27
• Meta: 42
• Berkshire Hathaway: 10

TLDR: Full-year profitability will be a momentous achievement, but in almost all cases, GME would have a very high PE ratio. Over the following quarters / years, GameStop will still need to increase profits substantially in order to obtain a good PE ratio.

Breakdown of GameStop stores by Technology Brands stores versus Video Game Brands stores versus all International stores

Google Sheets Link

And for fun,

GameStop Net Income Per Store

!

| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | Store Count | Revenue Per Store | Net Income Per Store | 10-K | |-------------|----------------|---------------|-------------|-------------------|----------------------|------| | 2005 | $3,091,783,000 | $100,784,000 | 4490 | $688,593.10 | $22,446.33 | link | | 2006 | $5,318,900,000 | $158,250,000 | 4778 | $1,113,206.36 | $33,120.55 | link | | 2007 | $7,093,962,000 | $288,291,000 | 5264 | $1,347,637.16 | $54,766.53 | link | | 2008 | $8,805,897,000 | $398,282,000 | 6207 | $1,418,704.20 | $64,166.59 | link | | 2009 | $9,077,997,000 | $377,265,000 | 6450 | $1,407,441.40 | $58,490.70 | link | | 2010 | $9,473,700,000 | $408,000,000 | 6670 | $1,420,344.83 | $61,169.42 | link | | 2011 | $9,550,500,000 | $339,900,000 | 6683 | $1,429,073.77 | $50,860.39 | link | | 2012 | $8,886,700,000 | -$269,700,000 | 6602 | $1,346,061.80 | $40,851.26 | link | | 2013 | $9,039,500,000 | $354,200,000 | 6675 | $1,354,232.21 | $53,063.67 | link | | 2014 | $9,296,000,000 | $393,100,000 | 6690 | $1,389,536.62 | $58,759.34 | link | | 2015 | $9,363,800,000 | $402,800,000 | 7117 | $1,315,694.82 | $56,596.88 | link | | 2016 | $8,607,900,000 | $353,200,000 | 7535 | $1,142,388.85 | $46,874.59 | link | | 2017 | $9,224,600,000 | $34,700,000 | 7276 | $1,267,811.98 | $4,769.10 | link | | 2018 | $8,285,300,000 | -$673,000,000 | 5830 | $1,421,149.23 | $115,437.39 | link | | 2019 | $6,466,000,000 | -$470,900,000 | 5509 | $1,173,715.74 | $85,478.31 | link | | 2020 | $5,089,800,000 | -$215,300,000 | 4816 | $1,056,852.16 | $44,705.15 | link | | 2021 | $6,010,700,000 | -$381,300,000 | 4573 | $1,314,388.80 | $83,380.71 | link | | 2022 | $5,927,200,000 | -$313,100,000 | 4413 | $1,343,122.59 | $70,949.47 | link |

| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | Store Count | Revenue Per Store | Net Income Per Store | 10-K | |-------------|----------------|---------------|-------------|-------------------|----------------------|------| | 2005 | $3,091,783,000 | $100,784,000 | 4490 | $688,593.10 | $22,446.33 | link | | 2006 | $5,318,900,000 | $158,250,000 | 4778 | $1,113,206.36 | $33,120.55 | link | | 2007 | $7,093,962,000 | $288,291,000 | 5264 | $1,347,637.16 | $54,766.53 | link | | 2008 | $8,805,897,000 | $398,282,000 | 6207 | $1,418,704.20 | $64,166.59 | link | | 2009 | $9,077,997,000 | $377,265,000 | 6450 | $1,407,441.40 | $58,490.70 | link | | 2010 | $9,473,700,000 | $408,000,000 | 6670 | $1,420,344.83 | $61,169.42 | link | | 2011 | $9,550,500,000 | $339,900,000 | 6683 | $1,429,073.77 | $50,860.39 | link | | 2012 | $8,886,700,000 | -$269,700,000 | 6602 | $1,346,061.80 | $40,851.26 | link | | 2013 | $9,039,500,000 | $354,200,000 | 6675 | $1,354,232.21 | $53,063.67 | link | | 2014 | $9,296,000,000 | $393,100,000 | 6690 | $1,389,536.62 | $58,759.34 | link | | 2015 | $9,363,800,000 | $402,800,000 | 7117 | $1,315,694.82 | $56,596.88 | link | | 2016 | $8,607,900,000 | $353,200,000 | 7535 | $1,142,388.85 | $46,874.59 | link | | 2017 | $9,224,600,000 | $34,700,000 | 7276 | $1,267,811.98 | $4,769.10 | link | | 2018 | $8,285,300,000 | -$673,000,000 | 5830 | $1,421,149.23 | $115,437.39 | link | | 2019 | $6,466,000,000 | -$470,900,000 | 5509 | $1,173,715.74 | $85,478.31 | link | | 2020 | $5,089,800,000 | -$215,300,000 | 4816 | $1,056,852.16 | $44,705.15 | link | | 2021 | $6,010,700,000 | -$381,300,000 | 4573 | $1,314,388.80 | $83,380.71 | link | | 2022 | $5,927,200,000 | -$313,100,000 | 4413 | $1,343,122.59 | $70,949.47 | link |

As many are aware, the SEC recently published Incoming No-Action Requests Under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, and there were several shareholder proposals submitted by GME shareholders that were rejected by the company that were published there.

There have already been a few discussions of these proposals on Reddit and on X and on Discord at least.

Some of the discussions about the rejected proposals have been nothing but negative and cynical and even disparaging towards those shareholders that submitted proposals.

So I just wanted to make this post to express some gratitude towards those shareholders that submitted a proposal, despite that GameStop rejected them.

It's really easy to criticize. It's very easy to sit behind a keyboard and put other people down while otherwise contributing nothing. It takes almost no effort to do this.

It's hard to build things, it's much easier to destroy things.

Those shareholders that submitted proposals are the types of people that are builders. They are activists. They are building and advancing our collective knowledge.

Some other people are not builders. They are destroyers. They revel when the builders struggle. They celebrate when the builders face setbacks. They scorn and shame the builders for having tried at all.

I sincerely appreciate the efforts of any shareholder that took the time and energy to submit a proposal, any proposal at all, even if it gets rejected.

Every little thing that GME shareholders do that produces additional knowledge is beneficial overall to all shareholders.

Some parties out there in the world that are in opposition to GME shareholders don't like this. They don't like it when GME shareholders get loud and get active. They would much prefer it if we would all just shut up and go away and forget GameStop.

That's not going to happen. I for one am not going anywhere.

🍻