Came here to post the same thing. I think calling out brake failure in headline or something about the driver not being present would help.

Do you have any examples?

I think a classroom, where the reading is guided and purposeful can be a good setting for these kinds of topics.

Yeah, I think the point is that the person answering was wrong/over complicating. If x=10i, then x^2 would be -100 (or potentially -10 depending on what you think the ^2 is applied to).

Maybe not the same thing as FPS chess, but a great chess rougelike with guns is https://store.steampowered.com/app/1972440/Shotgun_King_The_Final_Checkmate/

Yeah, this is definitely part of the issue when commercializing LLMs. When someone has to provide an SLA or asking how frequently will this fail, it's not great when the best answer "who knows".

Because all of these models are focused on text prediction/QA, the whole idea of "prompts" organically grew out of the functionality when they tried to make it something more useful/powerful. Everything from function calling, agents, now this are just be bolted onto the foundation of LLMs.

Its why this seems more like a patch than an actual iteration of the technology. They aren't approaching it at the fundamentals.

Same

It's a great game and fun to 100%.

Where's my water is a water physics game that's been around for a long time.

I understand your point, but that's what this law would theoritcally accomplish. It would limit representatives/senators from being able to trade stocks (a higher standard than an average citizen). While they can buy/sell stocks before the law, that's just the current state of affairs.

Regarding the timing of trades, etc. The value of their insider knowledge is really only beneficial over long periods of time. Yes they could buy/sell stock in the interim, but preventing it long term would be an actual win.

That's how laws work. You can't generally make something illegal retroactively, otherwise you could change the law to persecute anyone you want.

How would you want them to approach it?

Trump is almost as old as Biden and probably more senile. It's not just lying, Trump has a complete lack of understanding about how anything in the government functions. He only sounds coherent to many people because he literally says nothing.

If you re-watch the debate, you'll see Biden actually responds to questions about his policies and platform. Trump never comes close. Part of that is probably because he has no platform, but largely because I don't think he's capable of answering those questions.

"Required" might not be the right word, but here's an article about how the San Fransico Trains are updated via floppies - https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-muni-trains-floppy-disks/

In the US at least it's not about required, but more legacy support. There are still a lot of old systems that work, but use old technology.

Because Bronny got a pretty good deal. It looks likely that LeBron took a cut to give it to his son - https://nypost.com/2024/07/03/sports/bronny-james-contract-details-revealed-after-lebrons-lakers-deal/

That's an apples to oranges comparison. Self driving cars aren't driving on the same roads and in the same conditions. Maybe they're better, but that hasn't really been tested/evaluated.

Look into online banks like Ally or credit unions. I'm 99%sure that Ally has no minimum requirement and about a 4% interest rate for money in your savings account.

Yeah, I saw a couple of people mention Hollow Knight and was confused, it's not a rougelite/like game at all, just straight-up Metroidvania.

Rouge Legacy 1 & 2 are both great rougelite games.

Yeah, I don't imagine some of the online banks changing their operations, as places like Ally already provide a lot of cover for things like overdraft.

In that scenario it becomes another reason to not do business with JP.

Maybe to some, but certainly not everyone.

Not basically, most (current) recommendation systems are AI/ML based. Any big platform is using AI/ML recommendation algorithms.