I do not think that giving AI human rights is appropriate at this time. I also do not think it is a question that will need to be re-addressed anytime in the near future. We are in the beginning stages of a new technological breakthrough that are large language models. There is a lot of hype and uncertainty since we're in those beginning stages, but ultimately I suspect they are going to be really cool and capable clockwork machines. The question is just where the edge of their capabilities is.

It is very difficult to get a LLM to do anything outside of the scope of what it was trained to do, so they do not really adapt to new environments. That is something that is an important facet of humanness as far as I can tell because that same adaptability is used in almost everything we do. Even if the LLMs were as advanced as a (say) cockroach in adapting to an environment, they would still be a long way off from hitting a threshold that would be appropriate for human rights considerations. And we aren't anywhere near cockroach level yet.

One day in the future we may have to re-address the issue, but I will be very surprised if I'm alive to see it. Perhaps I'm wrong though :)

I suppose it depends on which part of the "plan" you're referring to. The parts where they want to strip down the bureaucratic state (federal agencies etc) is probably somewhat achievable under executive authority, but that will still take a while to accomplish because there are procedures in place that prevent just wholesale doing away with a lot of stuff, not to mention the court cases that will likely arise out of some of that.

To relieve a little bit of panic, something like banning pornography as a general statement (even the GBT portion) is going to be a major uphill battle, even with the conservative majority SCOTUS. The conservatives on the court are largely originalists, and despite being conservative they take a pretty hard-line free speech view of most things - the "test" that they use revolves around determining if the speech is calling for action that will cause imminent (physical) harm. Pornography does not meet that threshold.

Edit: To address defunding public schools, those are run by states. The Dept of Education gives some money to them, but most school funding in most places is acquired via property taxes or other local taxes for the area. The Federal government, project 2025 or no, can't do much about that.