And yet he didn't actually build the Hyperloop. Could this mean that Elon, the car salesman, secretly loves traffic???

Whether a 7-year-old sees adult content accidentally, intentionally, because of peer pressure or any other reason, I still think age appropriate sex ed would be helpful. I acknowledge that minors do view inappropriate content and that it is generally unhealthy, but since it can happen, and does happen, a good approach would be to educate them preemptively.

For example, these guildelines for sex ed in EU, which caused some outrage in conservative circles a few years back, suggest that "sex in media and dealing with it" is a topic for 6 to 9-year-olds.

Of course you can't cover every outlier, but can you really stop 5th graders from sending weird shit to their friends because they're trying to be edgy?

Edit:

Another way to think about it:

• Was the content accessed accidentally? If so, I would argue this law misses the point and better moderation would be more effective and also less, y'know, surveillance state adjacent
• Was the content accessed intentionally? In this case, sex ed would probably help

"When we evaluate how minors interact with the internet, for 90% of them it is their first way of getting to know about sexuality. From there, 50% of them recognise that they generate imitation and even with approaches that have domination as a central element. There is an enormous distortion in the way they are going to develop their sexuality", she stressed. [via DeepL, emphasis mine]

Hmmmmm, if only there was a way to educate minors about sexuality before they ultimately turn to internet because adults just ignore the problem.

Edit:

Incibe is also collaborating, which is checking that browsers "control access based on URLs" to prevent access to minors. Cabanillas said that "a black list" of browsers that do not do so will be created.

It's a miracle politicians aren't targeted by scammers more frequently, given they have no idea how internet works.

I imagine any reasonable traffic law would forbid drivers from impeding traffic like that. You might be able to do it somewhat discreetly, but it's still a matter of enforcement, and you can bet blue nonces will suddenly start caring about enforcing traffic laws.

Edit: UK Road Traffic Act

If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence.

Even more interesting that land use had a marginal cooling effect, despite also causing a net increase in CO2 emissions.

At first this caption made me think that Kenyan giraffes are especially gay, as if Kenya was some kind of Washington D.C. of giraffe world. In other news, I am now aware of grey whale orgies.

Silverstone staff should add more tyres at Copse, just in case.

WTF is going in

Russell win?

3 stopper yet somehow nothing happening on track

Death, taxes and Norris fucking up the start...

Jellyfin and sin

It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.

approval for a railroad project

Let's see...

that would carry crude oil

😭 what the heck

Also, good job Bing

2026 regs will reduce overall downforce and simplify floor design so the cars will be less reliant on ground effect. I'm not an aero engineer, but I suspect porpoising will be less of an issue because of this.

When a French car smells royal blood:

Why don't you just sell your house and move?

Goodbye.

Well, the rear wing did look exceptionally sketchy there, and he scattered a bunch of carbon fiber on the track, and the team did this to avoid a SC. Maybe a bit harsh for Pérez, but a justified penalty for Red Bull, imo.

Fidesz is nonaligned as well, judging by the polls it'll be about 9 or 10 seats for them.