Others have listed a bunch of good resources. If you are more of a visual learner, I have heard good things about the Easy Rust videos - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lYeJeQ11OI&list=PLfllocyHVgsRwLkTAhG0E-2QxCf-ozBkk

RSS link so you can add it to your preferred podcast client (I use AntennaPod) -

ChinaTalk https://chinatalk.substack.com/

RSS address: https://feeds.megaphone.fm/CHTAL4990341033

There are plenty of both really, too many perhaps

Hey! We have buff, and plenty of local pubs! The other things are true though, can't help you with those

Yes, my thoughts exactly.

This problem is not solved by monads, but by higher kinded types in general in languages like Haskell. They give you a uniform way to be generic over effects like async (Async) vs sync (Identity). Both of these can be treated as (F) for all A. So a generic Into would look like the following, and no special syntax or semantics would be needed. The type system (if sound) would prevent you from misusing a trait like this.

trait Into {
   def into(self): F;
}

Great! Yes an icon for PureScript would be great as well

This seems to have many similar ideas as Dhall Lang - https://dhall-lang.org/

These are woman bikers from various armed forces. This sort of a bike show happens every year on Republic day and it's always fun to watch

I’m a long time functional programming enthusiast and work with Haskell and PureScript professionally. I recently created the PureScript community on this instance and would be happy to to moderate the Haskell community as well.