This is a fascinating analogy, and I couldn't agree more.
First, you're sexy af and I think I speak for the community when I thank you for your contributions here. 😍
On the topic of catching you with a plug in, that would certainly be a turn on. However, I don't feel like I have any authority over how you present yourself in public, so it isn't as if I would confront you over it.
More than likely, I'd admire you from a distance and fantasize about you later, but if you happened to be making eyes at me, there's a good chance I'd try to chat you up and see where that leads.
Without knowing any of the specifics, my guess is that they're just jealous that you have perfect tits and they don't. 🤷♂️
Yep, there's a large contingent who simultaneously believe that corporations shouldn't be allowed to exist and also that they should be provided everything in life for free, as compensation for existing.
I'm not saying that nothing should be done to rein in corporate profits, as those are also out of control, but economic forces cut both ways and it feels disingenuous to suggest otherwise.
$10 in 2011 would be $13.56 today.
Source: https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/2011?amount=10
Per the article, the service hasn't changed in price in 12 years, while the platform has certainly received a decent number of updates, new features, new artists, etc.
If it isn't worth $11/month to you, don't pay it? But it doesn't seem right to insinuate that they're doing something outrageous by raising prices once in 12 years?