Yeah. I understand this, my question was about what happens when no insurance company wants to insure the property?

What are folks doing in those cases? Where I live you can't get a mortgage if you don't have proof of insurance and until your loan to value in hits a certain amount the bank basically manages the policy.

Community.

Former kbiner, but out of the loop on this one. What's I miss?

That sounds awful. And a major loss to accessibility. Here's hoping one of the standards gains traction as the one path everyone can agree on.

I'm not up to speed on this issue, but it seems like the solution is to push forward with making the readers work in Wayland? Is there a technical issue with Wayland's design that prevents readers from working properly?

Get out of here with your pragmatism. We'll have none of that in this security context.

It's huge. With a large family (or given recent inflation of pricings for eating out a small family) you can stay for an extra day or two with the savings from cooking some meals at your accomodations.

This is exactly the appeal of an Airbnb for me. Solo traveling a hotel is adequate, bit with a family having the extra space and kitchen is a game changer. Not to mention the individual charm of staying in a unique spot vs staying on a corporate decorated to the lowest common denominator hotel room.

This is something I consistently see overlooked in these discussions. I don't dispute that it increases prices for locals and there needs to be some balance, but hotels are not offering anything close to Airbnb's for a large section of travelers.

Maybe the fact you have to be there and read it while connected is the secret sauce to prove that it's a "real" library, meaning they have a fixed number of copies (max players connected to the server at any given time) and that helps them get protected the same way a real library is?

That sounds awful. We shouldn't support that kind of invasive tech for any reason.

That's perfectly fine for some things, but for most people letting their browser choice dictate what sites they use is backwards

I think the trouble is that many people that need the reliable 7k car, also need the road trip capabilities because that's their main mode of using their time off, because owning two cars and/or flying are out of the price range for folks that need a 7k car.

Until that's solved by better charge infrastructure or better range (or both) EVs aren't a good candidate for those folks and they're a sizeable part of the market.

Seems more like it's own top level discussion than related to the 1985 song. But carry on, who am I to rain on your parade?

Not sure I follow. I would definitely enjoy a return to user serviceable devices, including a removable battery compartment. The phones that offer these capabilities are few and far between and often involve unacceptable tradeoffs on other features.

Is there a community for lost lemmings?

Agree on the wallet front. It's good cases are available for folks that want them, I just see a lot of folks with cases and broken phones anyway, so for me it feels like a false sense of security.

It's a risk. 🤷‍♂️ I prefer to be self insured and manage my own risk.

I see plenty of folks with cases running around with cracked screens, so it's not a guaranteed safe approach.

We're a rare breed it seems. I don't like the extra bulk and I paid for a high end phone I don't want to feel a $20 case.

infosec.pub - user instance checks out. And I'm with you, it's awful for privacy. I'll keep using the plastic card.