I wonder how accurate it is though. What did the artist base it on?
I also wish they'd worded it in a way where it'd be illegal for women to marry children too, just to cover all bases.
Still is in California, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Oklahoma ...
Is it me? I see no real difference between 80% of these styles.
They can exercise those rights by serving their full sentence.
There's no reason to insult someone with a different viewpoint.
Please point out the actual transphobia? You can't just use that word willy-nilly.
It's absolutely fine, it was mildly annoying the first two times and now in glad I don't have to hold the cap while drinking.
So you're always behind, patching up small bits of code that don't comply with your guidelines, while letting big changes with, by deduction, worse code quality through?
It is. Originally they were a MIPS-like, then they licensed it and became MIPS-compatible, then they extended it into their own instruction set.
You don't quite understand. One of the major drawbacks of UUIDs over monotonically increasing id's is the lack of ability to sort them. Not just for manual querying, but for index operations, caching, data locality etc.
It's very handy and is a big part of the reason why Twitter developed Snowflake IDs, which are basically like UUIDs v6 and v7.
The UUIDs specs are quite easy to understand and definitely not "enterprisey".
They chose "version" because they are just that, versions. Improvements over the original design that benefit from new insights and technological improvements. We're lucky they had the foresight to include a version number in the spec.
A lot of people in this thread who don't fully understand how UUIDs work...
I understand, but keep in mind it could be an innocent user whose phone is taken over by malware, better be safe than sorry.
But apparently, not the bodies.
Why? They offer it as a fallback solution you have to explicitly enable, I can imagine it's not their focus given that the regular connection is encrypted.
What a weird set of events. It's not even clear what was actually used as infection method.
No it's not, what a weird take. If I publish my art online for enthusiasts to see it's not automatically licensed to everyone to distribute. If I specifically want to forbid entities I have huge ethical issues with (such as Google, OpenAI et. al.) from scraping and transforming my work, I should be able to.
I mean, both are true? It's not a manipulative headline in my opinion.