Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ZY
Zyrxil @lemmy.world
Posts 0
Comments 34
More House Democrats Say 'No' to Netanyahu Speech to Congress
  • Got it, giving an opinion that someone should not be invited to speak at a specific location is apparently not an expression of free speech, it's suppression of free speech. Just like how if someone comes up to you on the street and starts yelling in your face, it'd be suppression of speech for you to ask them to do that somewhere else.

  • More House Democrats Say 'No' to Netanyahu Speech to Congress
  • You're literally claiming things that are not true. Voicing your opinion against a prospective (as in it hasn't even happened) action by the Speaker of the House is a right afforded to everyone, including representatives. Speaking against something is not perversely somehow suppressing speech. Saying someone is not allowed to speak against something is suppressing of speech.

  • More House Democrats Say 'No' to Netanyahu Speech to Congress
  • You have not explained your reasoning at all on how saying they're against Netanyahu speaking in front of the House is subversion of free speech and not just those representatives exercising their own freedom of speech. That is exactly what freedom of speech is, the right for everyone in the US to voice their opinions.

    In contrast, there is no right to speak in front of the House, especially not for a foreign politician. The Speaker can invite someone to speak, and if anyone physically interferes with the invitee's speaking or shouts over them, that would be a violation of House procedures, not any infringement on their freedom of speech. They would not have been silenced or punished. They would not have been gagged (physically or otherwise). They would still be able voice their opinions.

    Actual examples of speech suppression would be searching and questioning pro-Palestinian journalists at the border, and arrests of peaceful non trespassing protestors.

  • Maybe you just need to get some sun
  • Did you sit down and watch the whole movie and not just the dramatic moments as YouTube clips? Outside of a few good Denzel moments, the movie was just awful in terms of dialogue, pacing, and blunt 'foreshadowing'

  • You can vomit watermelons at will
  • These are normal whole melons with normal nutritional value? And I can vomit an infinite number of them? For one watermelons are delicious so I could have one on hand at any time. I'd learn to develop my power over time so every melon I vomit would be the most delicious watermelon anyone's tasted. I'd fake a hydroponic growing operation and start selling them at $30 a pop. Eventually I'd be so good with my power I could vomit a hundred watermelons a minute and with that kind of throughout I could just start using watermelons frivolously. I'd make them into fertilizer, make a plastic replacement from watermelon, use them as landfill to build artificial land in the sea. Watermelon Man would rule the world.

  • Truong My Lan: Vietnamese billionaire sentenced to death for $44bn fraud
  • It's a bank not a hedge fund. The investors would be the regular people that made deposits- you know, the victims of the fraud. So your knee jerk reaction is "investors bad" without thinking about anything?

  • After watching batman throw around explosives left and right I no longer believe batman doesn't use guns because of some sort of moral quandary but rather he just prefers the challenge.
  • In early depictions of Batman, there were times in which he freely killed criminals and times where he was an officially deputized state agent. In contrast, most depictions since at least the late 80s and 90s were much more progressive, with Bruce Wayne being the biggest philanthropist in Gotham, helping to provide low cost housing and healthcare, as well as funding criminal rehabilitation and direct job placement for ex-cons with Wayne Industries. Writers were aware of the other aspects of justice that Batman needed to embody long before it was trendy on the internet to edgily portray Batman as a billionaire who enjoys beating people up for fun.

  • Jodie Foster: Gen Z can be 'really annoying' to work with
  • Or you know, just an older person going "Kids these days". It's a much more likely explanation considering Jodie Foster has been working in Hollywood since she was a child, and people that are actually hard to get with would have gotten soft blacklisted long, especially a non-AAA star.