Dead

TBF, like half the content here, this would qualify if it was just superimposed on a Twitter post with some caption like "Me fr fr"

Makes me wonder if those $80 Monster HDMI cables were lucrative. Might be that the rule applies not just to luxury goods, but for any good where the consumer is too ignorant of the market to have any frame of reference to compare to (e.g. the technologically illiterate).

But again, you can make that argument about any platform or medium where speech can be posted or displayed. If the department of public health condemns a local movie theater where I host indie movie screenings, that is not a violation of my first amendment rights because they are not prohibiting my ability to make or share content, they are simply removing the space it is currently shared. If that comes out to the same effect for some people who are all-in on TikTok to the exclusion of any other short-form video sharing service, sure, maybe there are grievances. But that still ends up being a self-imposition made by the individual at the end of the day.

Not to mention, the US government is not trying to close down TikTok. They are prohibiting the owners of TikTok from doing business in the US. The company itself would be the one to make the decision to close the service rather than sell it off, so unless the fed is going to force a private business to keep itself open to placate the masses, it's a decision made by a private company outside of any constitutional law.

This MF right now

The right for a business to operate is not protected by the first amendment, though.

I could use that argument to stop the government from closing/dismantling any physical space because I might use their walls to express my first amendment rights. But the argument just doesn't hold up.

Can confirm, I was able to run it yesterday without issue. If you load into Syrcus Tower and people start to panic, just reassure them that it is no longer bugged.

That being said, every once in a blue moon I run into encounters where folks with the frog buff keep it long enough to melt the safety ice that spawns second, so make sure the frogs don't get too overzealous freeing people.

Apparently Paladin's cover is enough to spare the life of a healer as well. So if you have a Paladin tank, one healer in that alliance can sac themselves while the other gets shielded through it and can quickly start bringing others back up.

Makes me wonder why they even bothered to have 7 different notes instead of 6, with B# and E# as valid notation.

Hi this is your doctor, we need to talk urgently about your test results, please call us back.

I hope broader international recognition of Palestine helps spur more recognition of Kurdistan.

That shit should be illegal.

Moderna has their combined vaccine currently in clinical trials.

Paywall

Leave room for my detritus.

I want to be a Camus but most days I'm a Cioran.

We put Kalashnikov on Sergey's rowboat, Ukraine cowers before invincible Russian engineering!

Just wanted to remind folks looking at the job changes that potency numbers you see may not always mean the same thing from job to job.

Potency is meant to give you a sense of how powerful certain abilities in a kit are compared to another, but potencies across jobs are not always equal. A Paladin potency may not be the same as a Samurai potency may not be the same as a Sage potency, etc.

This was an issue on Samsung devices last year, but the OneUI 6.1 update ended up fixing it for me.

My initial bug report:

https://lemmy.world/post/9269197

My post after the bug was fixed:

https://lemmy.world/post/15496619

Device information

Sync version: v24.03.26-14:56    
Sync flavor: googlePlay    

Ultra user: true    
View type: List    
Push enabled: false    

Device: p3q    
Model: samsung SM-G998U    
Android: 14

That and it's impossible say whether or not a given tool or object will never be used to do harm if wielded by the wrong entity.

Like, say you're someone who makes free bricks. Someone uses the brick to build a house, great, that's what it's made for. Someone uses that brick to shatter a cop's windshield, even better.

But someone can also use that brick to smash in the windows of a school, or even that the house built with the bricks you made is being lived in by a bad person.

No one makes bricks thinking "this could be a weapon, I am responsible for the harm it causes" because its primary purpose as building material is self-evident. It therefore has no inherent morality outside of what people you can't control choose to do with what they have. All the brick maker wants to do is make the best bricks they can.