I actually didn't come up with the title. Maybe another editor did? Because that's who helps write these things. But if you look at the science in the article, I think the title is fine. If you don't like the title. Make a new one.
Uh huh, coming from the guy crying about a title that says "air pollution is becoming more dangerous than smoking" just because it mentions specific countries in the headline does not mean air pollution in other countries is less toxic if it exists. Sure Western countries have had more regulations. Take a look at the fire map for the USA, then read right pass the headline. If you can.
I think you might be retarded. The air particulates are more dangerous than smoking. Doesn't matter where you are.
Read the article retard. If you don't like it, hit me with those useless downvotes.
Which title? Did an editor write the title? You all should fight for the biggest retard title in the thunder dome.
Yeah the contents do matter, god damn retard lol
It's not bait if you actually read the article. Also I should be gaining something. People don't fish for nothing.
Just look at all the retards complaining about the title, but only read the title of the article. What a world.
Here ya go dumbasses that can't get over the title.
"Wildfires are exacerbating a huge threat to human health.
More dangerous than tobacco or alcohol, air pollution is exacerbated in certain regions of the world including Asia and Africa, according to a study out today.
"Particulate air pollution remains the world’s greatest external risk to human health", says the report issued by the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC).
Despite this, the funds allocated to the fight against air pollution represent only a tiny fraction of those devoted to infectious diseases, for example.
Fine particulate matter is caused by fires, industrial activity and motorised vehicles. They are carcinogenic and increase the risk of lung disease, heart disease and strokes.
According to figures from the World Health Organisation (WHO), 36% of lung cancers are linked to these emissions, as are 34% of strokes and 27% of heart disease.
Compliance with the WHO threshold for exposure to fine particles would increase global life expectancy by 2.3 years, EPIC estimates, based on data collected in 2021."
Right in the damn article. The United States and I'm sure other parts of the world are having wild fires as well. Are they healthier outside of Asia?
It's a new article, there's no bait. There's wildfires everywhere. I gain nothing from you reading the article
Guess what. The United States is dealing with massive wild fires. And guess what this article talks about.
This is WORLD news and I just copied the title from my feed.
The article is there for you to read. I didn't leave out anything. I will say air does move across the Pacific ocean and we've been having some nice wild fires here in the states.
Scientist warn 1 billion on track to die from climate change.
The fossil fuels that humanity burns today will be a death sentence for many lives tomorrow.
Air pollution could be spreading antibiotic resistance.
Antibiotic resistance is a growing threat to global health.
You're such a dumbass lmao.
Youre the one talking about lap dances dipshit
Hurry, strap desantis to a kite