Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ST
Starseeder @awful.systems
Posts 1
Comments 9
That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out

  • https://x.com/tracewoodgrains/status/1811602818614133141

    Just posted this banger song

    •
    That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out
    • That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out

  • Can't miss an opportunity to make it about himself I guess

    •
    That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out

  • What an ass

    •
    That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out

  • I don't know i had to skim it too. Its hard to see what point he's trying to make. I can see why many of wikis choices are shit but he also seems to complain about takis magazine being removed witch just seems like a sensible choice. And he's still up on his high horse about that conference where HBD people were invited to speak. They think "rationality" is about seeking heterodox thinkers but you don't see anyone who believes in shit like miasma theory or any other discredited idea besides race there.

    •
    That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out

  • Didn't he violate Wikipedias rules though

    • SneerClub @awful.systems Starseeder @awful.systems

    That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out
    www.tracingwoodgrains.com Reliable Sources: How Wikipedia Admin David Gerard Launders His Grudges Into the Public Record

    A love story

    Reliable Sources: How Wikipedia Admin David Gerard Launders His Grudges Into the Public Record
    246
    Real people's real problems? Nah, it's AI Welfare Debate Week here at the EA Forums

  • EA will basically adopt any stupid issue except for socialism. They support welfare for animals and machines but not humans at least not through systemic change

    •
    TracingWoodgrains launches a defense of Manifest's controversial reputation, all without betraying a basic understanding of what the word "controversial" means.

  • Why do they care about hbd to begin with? Listening to fringe ideas isn't a formula for becoming smarter

    •
    TracingWoodgrains launches a defense of Manifest's controversial reputation, all without betraying a basic understanding of what the word "controversial" means.

  • https://x.com/tracewoodgrains/status/1805683265480933638

    He's getting mad at scientific american again because they wrote a shit opinion peice but he should know the wiki guidelines are generally against citing opinion pieces as fact in your article

    "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (invited op-eds and letters to the editor from notable figures) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact."

    https://x.com/tracewoodgrains/status/1803489864488460647

    Same here, and I'm not even sure what was so bad about what was said because it was generally a tame article compared to many others.