Well they were probably too loyal to their idiot Fuhrer. Methinks it's the loyalty part that Trump wants.

Wow so edgy and original!

Never heard a Hamas propagandist say "actually Israel is nazi" before!

That's just how almost everything goes, isn't it? Simpsons, Walking Dead, Dune, Game of Thrones, etc.

Endings are hard, and most things have an unsatisfying ending or go on for too long because they keep making it as long as it makes money.

Nightsisters are kind of like vampires and porgs are kind of like pokemon. We've also seen zombie storm troopers, but I was kind of fine with that because it was so ridiculous I couldn't stop laughing.

Yeah, Star Wars peaked with ESB. That's not to say it's all complete shit since then, but nothing in Star Wars has risen to the height it was at 44 years ago.

Having 100 clones on screen without 100 extras still looks good.

Better than having 100 extras in storm trooper costumes? I'd rather see just a dozen storm troopers over 100 CGI troopers. Quality over quantity.

They have a list of people that are registered to vote. They mark off the people on the list who have voted so they can't vote twice. But when the person actually votes it's done outside the sight of anyone else (sometimes behind a curtain) so no one knows who they voted for.

There was a time when there were gangs outside of polling stations that would beat the shit out of people that didn't vote how they wanted. And considering how insane the MAGAs are, it's not too improbable this kind of thing could happen again if it weren't for having a secret ballot system.

Yeah a classic. For additional context, Crossfire was cancelled about a week after that and Tucker Carlson never wore a bowtie again.

The point is that when violence starts, the politics don't matter anymore. Whoever has the better army wins, there is nothing else other than that. Politics can lead to a war but once a war starts, the politics don't really matter anymore. It's just a lot of death and suffering until one side comes out on top. Which is why radical violent movements are really stupid.

If they're putting ads on their site then it's clear they want to make money. You're imposing your views onto other people when they've clearly indicated they don't think they way you want them to.

Yeah it's really lame... seems like the ban is permanent, so I went ahead and blocked lemmy.ml. No point in seeing content from communities that some self-righteous admin decided I shouldn't be allowed to interact with.

It is what it is. I already left reddit because of their bullshit owners. There's still way better communities on reddit than on lemmy.ml, and as bullshit as the owners of reddit are, they're still not as bad as the owners of lemmy.ml. So if it were really an issue to me I'd just go back to reddit. But it's fun to discuss things in smaller communities so I'll stick with lemmy, just not lemmy.ml.

Now you're talking about CEOs as a nebulous they.

I'm talking about a CEO that said things similar to what an amazon exec said under an article about what that amazon exec said.

Also I work in software development. There has been a clear uptick in negativity towards developers where I work, which happens to be in a similar field to the one in the article.

I've also worked with AWS, and I can tell you for sure, they can't afford to lose their best talent. Their system is pretty janky in many places and their boss should be putting more effort in making better software instead of playing games about forcing people to sit in a specific chair 5 days per week.

Sinwar was released in a previous deal. Then he plotted a genocide. A real genocide not the bullshit rebranding of a war as a genocide that's a common narrative around here.

Sinwar was found and killed outside of his bunker with only two guards, probably scrounging for food. Why would Israel want to potentially release another Sinwar? Why would they want to give Hamas new reinforcements for their next attempt at genocide?

Hamas needs to surrender unconditionally. It's over, they committed genocide, and now their cities are destroyed. But like how the Nazis continued on for another month after Hitler offed himself, they'll probably continue on for a while longer. It can take a little time for people indoctrinated into fascist beliefs to understand they lost. They believe themselves to be supermen that can still somehow destroy the enemy even when it's obvious to anyone else that they lost.

Did you spend a lot of time googling up some links from 10 years ago?

Meanwhile... https://duckduckgo.com/?q=palestinians+celebrating

Zero effort to find some good old fascist violent fervor on full display in the society Hamas created. And now Gaza looks a lot like how cities in Germany looked in 1945. Only question now is whether Palestinians can move past the politics of hate like Germans did.

People that romanticize civil wars and revolutions often hate that movie. But that's exactly the kind of person it was made for. Radical politics don't accomplish all that much other than getting a lot of people killed.

There's http response code 402 (payment required) which comes before even 404 (page not found). Indicates to me that people were thinking about using the web for commerce even before they thought about people putting in a wrong URL.

There’s also a pretty… sane… subgroup that proposes ‘corrective breeding’; a process wherein we undo the destructive changes humans introduced to the species and return them to what would be found in their ‘natural’ state

Yeah I feel like that is just forcing animals to live in the way humans want them to live under a weird assumption that we know what they want.

I could live out in the wild if I really wanted to, but I don't because living in a heated home, having access to healthcare, and having a grocery store nearby is way better than starving to death, getting frostbite, dying of a disease, or getting eaten by wolves. I don't know how an animal wants to live their lives, so who knows, maybe they'd rather die of disease over being poked by a few needles by a veterinarian, starving because there's no mangers filled by humans, or getting eaten alive by a pack of wolves. Maybe animals want that, but there's no way of knowing and it's a really weird thing to assume given humans don't want to live that way. We live happy an fulfilling lives without having to constantly worry about being eaten by wolves, why would that be a requirement for an animal to be happy?

I think people see nature from a Disney cartoon perspective where the only danger is a human hunter. But the reality is nature is extremely brutal.

I don't think a perfect ethical solution to domesticated animals really exists. Best we can do is just treat animals better. If they seem like they're happy enough, then that's probably alright.

trying to please everyone has never been a seriously effective Democratic strategy, especially in the long term.

Do you think it would be more effective to piss off people? Maybe she could start telling us which voters she thinks are "deplorable"? Is that more effective than trying to please as many voters as possible?

The Dems have won three out of the last four elections. Not sure why you're saying this strategy is not effective given the one they lost was the one where their candidate called some voters deplorable.

Waltz was a great addition, but the campaign hid him away the second Harris took on most of Hillary’s campaign advisors.

The VP candidate is not supposed to overshadow the Presidential candidate. Walz has been on the campaign trail basically non-stop, and doing local interviews which may actually be more important than national interviews. The national media doesn't pick up on things Walz is doing all the time, but don't confuse that with the campaign hiding him away. Harris' debate performance and national interviews are much stronger than Walz's debate performance on the national stage. So why would they be trying to push a guy to do national interviews that he's not great at instead of doing rallies and local interviews which he is good at?

The CEO of Zoom explictily stated that he felt in zoom meetings people were being too "friendly" and not willing to have "debate".

Why would it be bad for employees to be friendly? What employees want to have unfriendly debates in meetings? I think it's just managers that want that. What kind of "debate" do managers want? Why do they not want meetings to be "friendly"? Methinks they just want to yell at employees and don't feel comfortable doing it in zoom meetings for some reason...

The point isn't to get the trans vote. Like you say it's kinda a no brainer for trans people to vote for anyone running against a transphobic guy.

The point is to put out a rational response to what Trump is doing. Explain to people that might be worried about trans people that it's just a tactic meant to distract people from the real issues.

So get people to be less scared of trans people so they'll focus on actual issues and vote Dem.