Police said one man stayed and made a statement, in the US at least this means identifying yourself, so they have a likely reliable way to identify the men involved
Biden could execute all members of the court and replace them with people who will agree everything he does is legal.
I'd hope this ruling would inspire the need, but I won't hold my breath.
Brossieres are known to cause medical issues, mostly back, spine, wear and damage.
Does evolutionary pressure only exist on individuals? I've never heard that. There's a wide variety of species that are highly socially organized, do you not accept that that's through evolutionarily pressure?
There I fixed it, now you look out of context!
It's an actual sharpened metal replica type of collectable, also in England people using ''but it's just a novelty knife'' as a defense has a long history at this point. It really wouldn't be safe to use as a fidget item, and it's not at all sold, or made as a fidget toy.
The fact that Clarence Thomas has his name on this ruling really helps illustrate how easy and often cheap it is to simply buy rulings.
Very similar to Nazis path to power, a lot of provocative action, violence, and people stop giving a shit that they are constantly doing this, an attempt at a violent coup, it dosen't work, then the people in power create legal pretexts to allow a seemingly legal way to dictatorship.
That's what all these articles missed, this isn't a first offense, the man is a known burglar, did 4 years previously
It's not mentioned in this article, but the man in question has a long history of burglary and did four years for a string of thefts. It's likely a big part of why HIM carrying a 6'' blade is concerning.
It's like I tell my kids, an adult is just a child who got old. It's also why a lot of cultures have a concept of adulthood that has nothing to do with reaching sexual maturity alone.
What I wrote -- Very easily impressed with basic factual statements
What you think it means -- there's something wrong with people who are learning new things.
Does ''basic factual statements'' mean ''new information that someone is just now learning''. Can it also apply to information they already know, or believe is true? Can it also be referring to basic knowledge nearly everyone knows?
Does 'being very easily impressed' include a situation where someone reacts to information in a typical fashion? Does it exclude adults learning or recognizing factual information and responding with a simple agreement, such as 'yeah that's true'? Or is this an indication that an overreacting response is the dead giveaway?
-
Did the sentance make a claim something is wrong with being a child?
-
Did the sentence claim that learning new information is likewise something wrong?
Please write one 5 sentance paragraph explaining your opinion on the above two numbered questions. Proofreading will not be necessary.
I bet if you killed everyone on the court and in the legislature and replaced themb with your personal sycophants, they would probably agree it was an 'official act'
In My experience energy weapons turn the victim into a toothpaste like glowing blue puddle.
But that kid was killed by an attack marked ''to whom it may concern'', not a focused deliberate attack with his name on it. He was a casualty, not a victim of assassination.
time to prepare for a harsh right wing fascist regime
Wow, that's a good point, but some people may take it the wrong way and say things like 'what taco bell are we meeting up at to plan to depose the current massively corrupt Supreme.... taco?' 'Is surprise attacks on Taco Bell's military installations a viable objective?' 'Would the taco bell 'fresh crew' join the efforts to over turn the corporate structure?' 'Or should we all just move to Spain and enjoy the authentic taste of a secular society with universal healthcare and tapas as far as the eye can see'?
Did you sexually assualt that poor woman?
"I'm no church boy"
That's a REALLY bad answer.
I really wanna go back to when if a candidate went 'yeeeeah' in too weird a voice we all just dropped them out of the running.
The president isn't actually running the entire county himself, Biden's government isn't fundamentally different from Obama's, Trump also, very obviously from his first term, didn't have much involvement at all in his government. The appointments, the policies his government focus on is a very big deal. Which 80 year old napping from 12pm to 5pm and going to bed, is not the difference that matters.