The saddest part is they can directly see Mr. Tusk himself with his human garbage opinions and they still continue to contribute to the platform, then wonder why the world is on fire, suffering from cultural wars, and economic decline.
Agreed. This needs to die right next to EULAs being able to redefine "purchase" and "own". Toss em both into a fire pit. No consumer in their right mind would see the garuntee and take it at anything but face value, just like no consumer would see "purchase to own" as a "licensing" contract and not a direct ownership model. The 2000s have really disappointed in the consumer protections spaces in some frankly obvious ways. It's not even about them not being able to run their businesses the way they want, we're all fine with price increases and licensing, it's the fact they lie about it to trick people into agreements they otherwise would decline.
Never underestimate the fleeting willpower of gamers in the face of exclusivity deals. It's already captured a large section of the market (xbox consoles literally just run modified windows now) and will likely capture more. It's all about adding enough of a marketing spin on it until the average gamer stops caring, or concedes the value proposition or their morals in favor of something they want more (like a next gen Skyrim reboot or something idk 🤷♂️)
Dollar dollar bills, ya'll.
This question is more rhetorical than you think it is.
It's sad you're proud enough of that comment to link it.
Ah, the falicy of choice. A very privileged position to have. I hope you continue to have the privilege to have such choice, but I also hope you develop the empathy to see the disparity in removing it from others.
You lack empathy, don't ya? Selfish. The world could use less "that's just the way it is" people. Teachers or not.
You can literally sniff the fucking traffic and see that's not true. You understand there are laws of physics at play here and the devices can't sneak data/etc past them, right? Default android devices send significantly more data back to home base than a defaultly configured iOS device.
It's more like calling your neighbor a pervert when they force you to undress in front of them prior to showering, or force you to go out naked in public. There's no legitimate reason to block vpn tools aside from bathwidth or tracking issues, the former can be handled by QoS and the latter isn't an issue unless you're using your "free Wi-Fi" to harvest data.
Lol why is this an opinion? If people want to vpn out of my network I don't give a fuuuuuuuuck. Now if you're raw doggin' that traffic or sucking down the bandwidth don't bitch when I filter or throttle, for sure, but surely you can at least empathize with people wanting to use privacy tools, ya tool.
Like it or not, most cyber insurance policies require all endpoints and hosts be secured with industry approved edr solution. Crowdstrike is a very popular multi platform player in that space. 🤷♂️
Didn't really have much of a choice now did they?
This would've been massively underfunded, underdeveloped, and broken. They can't even get potholes handled, no way they're managing millions of radio transcievers haha.
+1 for namecheap. They've been reliable and fair to me for years.
Since people here are critiquing you instead of actually assisting, I'd have you take a look at tailscale. You can use it to easily create a resistant vpn between your home and your work network, allowing the traffic to bypass filtering.
Hmdi 2.1 and the hdmi consortium prevented them from releasing code. It wasn't even proprietary, just based on a licensed implementation from what I understood.
Not a high enough failure rate. Gotta crank up the heat.
Did anyone actually expect decent upstream support from Qualcomm? I know they do upstream quite a bit, but when it comes down to their bread/butter it's generally kept private and on lockdown.