Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PA
مهما طال الليل @lemm.ee

If international law doesn’t apply in Palestine, it doesn’t apply anywhere else either

Posts 927
Comments 396
www.972mag.com The decimation of Gaza’s academia is ‘impossible to quantify’

With thousands of faculty and students likely killed and campuses destroyed, Gaza's universities are barely surviving Israel’s scholasticide.

The decimation of Gaza’s academia is ‘impossible to quantify’
0

عبدالمجيد عبدالله - شويخ من ارض مكناس (حفل البحرين) | 2022

0
If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy.
  • Has the US achieved any of its goals against Yemen? What has the prosperity guardian guarded?

    Or to put it differently. When did the US lose against Taliban? In 2001? Or in 2021?

    Taking out Iranian drones and projectiles cost the US over a billion dollars and required the coordination of multiple countries. In a war of attrition the US will lose, just like in Vietnam and Afghanistan before.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/missile-drone-pentagon-houthi-attacks-iran-00132480

    “The cost offset is not on our side,” said one DOD official.

  • خولة بنعمران - زين جبل & عين زورة - Benamrane Khawla - Zin jbal & Ain Zora ( music cover video )

    0

    Israel ordered Hannibal Directive on October 7. The western media ignored it then and will continue to ignore it now.

    !

    1
    If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy.
  • True. This is something that I need to work on and improve. I am aware of it but don't know how to mitigate it.

    To me it looks like my response is well cited with numbers and quotes, but I know that it comes across as abrasive and I don't know where this failure is happening.

    Thank you for the honest feedback.

  • www.academia.edu Eshem and Ashima: gods of the "Name"

    In scholarship on Levantine religion the divine names Eshem and Ashima are generally regarded as closely connected, but the question of their etymology and meaning continues to prompt debate. The present study offers a critical review of the

    Eshem and Ashima: gods of the "Name"
    0
    [April 2024] Hamas official says group would lay down its arms if an independent Palestinian state is established
  • The Palestinian Authority is secular and was a partner in the Oslo Accords and peace process. Where did that get the Palestinians? Nowhere.

    The Palestinians secular or otherwise, cannot meet people half way who don't want to meet them at all. The Israeli right which has dominated politics since the assassination of Rabin in 1995 -assassinated because of the peace with Palestinians- has zero desire to recognize any Palestinian state on any part of Palestine.

  • If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy.
  • Yes it is. The Israeli port of Eilat for example went bankrupt due to the blockade by the Yemeni forces.

    To date, the US has lost at least three Reaper drones over Yemen, each costing $30m.

    Estimates of the total cost of the operation range between $260m and $573m per month – that is, between $1.8bn and $4bn so far.

    None of the US and its allies’ actions in the Red Sea have stopped the disruption of shipping lanes. Shipping and insurance costs have soared.

    President Biden himself has admitted that the strikes against Houthis do not work. Yet, he has refused to stop them even as experts are suggesting that “strategic inaction” may in fact be more effective. He has also refused to use the most effective way to stop the Houthis: to press Israel into putting an end to the genocide in Gaza. The Houthis have repeatedly made clear that their attacks will stop as soon as there is a ceasefire.

    US foreign policy fails again, this time against the Houthis

  • كـلـيب مسيطرة - 2024 |

    0
    www.aljazeera.com US foreign policy fails again, this time against the Houthis

    The Houthis have endured a half-year of American strikes, delivering US President Biden a major foreign policy defeat.

    US foreign policy fails again, this time against the Houthis

    > To date, the US has lost at least three Reaper drones over Yemen, each costing $30m. > > Estimates of the total cost of the operation range between $260m and $573m per month – that is, between $1.8bn and $4bn so far. > > None of the US and its allies’ actions in the Red Sea have stopped the disruption of shipping lanes. Shipping and insurance costs have soared. > > President Biden himself has admitted that the strikes against Houthis do not work. Yet, he has refused to stop them even as experts are suggesting that “strategic inaction” may in fact be more effective. He has also refused to use the most effective way to stop the Houthis: to press Israel into putting an end to the genocide in Gaza. The Houthis have repeatedly made clear that their attacks will stop as soon as there is a ceasefire.

    1
    If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy.
  • Yemen’s motives are clear, and they have offered to stop their blockade if the genocide in Gaza stops. But regardless of why, or whether you believe the Yemenis are justified or not, the US is losing in Yemen.

    https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4501958-houthi-fight-pentagon-cost/amp/

    In most cases, the U.S. is launching $2 million defense missiles to stop $2,000 Houthi drones, a discrepancy that the Yemeni rebel group has noted in its statements mocking Washington.

  • www.presstv.ir US-occupied airbase comes under fresh attack in Iraq

    An airbase housing the US’s occupation forces in western Iraq comes under fresh attack.

    US-occupied airbase comes under fresh attack in Iraq
    0
    If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy.
  • My observation based on everyone who was cheering the US military action against Yemen and its unconditional support of Israel.

    It is a hyperbolic statement. I think at least 50% of the US public opposes the operations in Yemen and the unconditional support of Israel. But without a solid public opposition, perhaps a general strike, no one is stopping the US from getting into more pointless wars.

  • US medics volunteered in Gaza: Death toll is more than 92,000

    0
    peacenow.org.il While We Were at War: The Government's Annexation Revolution in the West Bank Since October 7th - Peace Now

    Special Report – Settlement Watch Team July, 2024  Download the full report as PDF Following Netanyahu’s meeting with US President Biden and his speech to the US Congress, as he travels across the United States amid his fight for political survival while waging a destructive war and refusing to acce...

    While We Were at War: The Government's Annexation Revolution in the West Bank Since October 7th - Peace Now
    0

    إيلاف قريش.. اتفاقية غيرت تاريخ العرب

    0

    المُخبر الاقتصادي+ | من دمر السودان وجوع أهله؟ من يقف وراء أكبر أزمة جوع في العالم؟

    0

    If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy.

    Yet that's exactly what happened and the US public are not only okay with it, but eager to repeat it again.

    So now I am taking bets on how much time and money do you think the US will lose in the Middle East to achieve nothing except looking foolish in the eyes of the world.

    18

    Peeling The American Onion

    www.michaelmoore.com Peeling The American Onion

    It Ain't Over 'Til The Last Burger King Leaves Kandahar

    Peeling The American Onion

    > We spent over $2.4 trillion in Afghanistan for 20 years while the poor in America went without food, medical care, decent schools. The water in the Black-majority city of Flint was poisoned by the Governor. A thousand people shot by the police in the U.S. each year. > > The pundits on TV wail: “We’ve abandoned our Afghan helpers! No one will ever trust us again! No one will ever believe us! Our word is no good!!” > > EXACTLY! Correct! Yessss! We should never be believed! Note to the rest of the world: You see us coming? RUN! Nothing but tragedy awaits you. Do NOT help us. If we sign a climate agreement, we will not follow it! If we sign a nuclear deal with your mullahs, don’t believe it. It only means we’re getting ready to bomb you. And you should know that when it comes to we, the American public, there is not a single morning where we ever wake up thinking about you or giving a rat’s ass whether 80% of your people live in a state of oppressive abject poverty. It’s always only about us, baby — and what YOU can do for US, for our AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE!

    0
    mondoweiss.net Netanyahu’s Congressional address and Kamala Harris on Israel and Palestine

    Michael Arria and Phil Weiss unpack a tumultuous week in U.S. politics as Kamala Harris appears to lock up the Democratic Party nomination for president, and Benjamin Netanyahu makes his case for genocide to the U.S. Congress, to rapturous applause.

    Netanyahu’s Congressional address and Kamala Harris on Israel and Palestine
    0

    2002 Arab Peace Initiative

    The Arab Peace Initiative (Arabic: مبادرة السلام العربية; Hebrew: יוזמת השלום הערבית), also known as the Saudi Initiative (Arabic: مبادرة السعودية; Hebrew: היוזמה הסעודית), is a 10 sentence proposal for an end to the Arab–Israeli conflict that was endorsed by the Arab League in 2002 at the Beirut Summit and re-endorsed at the 2007 and at the 2017 Arab League summits.[1] The initiative offers normalisation of relations by the Arab world with Israel, in return for a full withdrawal by Israel from the occupied territories (including the West Bank, Gaza, the Golan Heights, and Lebanon), with the possibility of comparable and mutual agreed minor swaps of the land between Israel and Palestine, a "just settlement" of the Palestinian refugee problem based on UN Resolution 194, and the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.[2]

    The Palestinian Authority led by Yasser Arafat immediately embraced the initiative.[4] His successor Mahmoud Abbas also supported the plan and officially asked U.S. President Barack Obama to adopt it as part of his Middle East policy.[5] Initial reports indicate that Islamist political party Hamas, the elected government of the Gaza Strip, was deeply divided,[6] while later reports indicate that Hamas accepted the peace initiative.[7][8] The Israeli government under Ariel Sharon rejected the initiative as a "non-starter"[9] because it required Israel to withdraw to pre-June 1967 borders.[10] In 2015, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed tentative support for the Initiative,[11] but in 2018, he rejected it as a basis for future negotiations with the Palestinians.[12]

    0
    2002 Arab Peace Initiative
  • Zionists love to claim that Arabs never wanted peace. But the reality is that they rejected all peace proposals that didn’t give them all of Palestine. Since Menachim Begin it was Israeli policy to slowly expand the settlements on Palestinian lands to prevent any possibility of a Palestinian state. Use facts on the ground, i.e. the settlements to force more concessions from Palestinians.

  • 2002 Arab Peace Initiative

    The Arab Peace Initiative (Arabic: مبادرة السلام العربية; Hebrew: יוזמת השלום הערבית), also known as the Saudi Initiative (Arabic: مبادرة السعودية; Hebrew: היוזמה הסעודית), is a 10 sentence proposal for an end to the Arab–Israeli conflict that was endorsed by the Arab League in 2002 at the Beirut Summit and re-endorsed at the 2007 and at the 2017 Arab League summits.[1] The initiative offers normalisation of relations by the Arab world with Israel, in return for a full withdrawal by Israel from the occupied territories (including the West Bank, Gaza, the Golan Heights, and Lebanon), with the possibility of comparable and mutual agreed minor swaps of the land between Israel and Palestine, a "just settlement" of the Palestinian refugee problem based on UN Resolution 194, and the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.[2]

    The Palestinian Authority led by Yasser Arafat immediately embraced the initiative.[4] His successor Mahmoud Abbas also supported the plan and officially asked U.S. President Barack Obama to adopt it as part of his Middle East policy.[5] Initial reports indicate that Islamist political party Hamas, the elected government of the Gaza Strip, was deeply divided,[6] while later reports indicate that Hamas accepted the peace initiative.[7][8] The Israeli government under Ariel Sharon rejected the initiative as a "non-starter"[9] because it required Israel to withdraw to pre-June 1967 borders.[10] In 2015, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed tentative support for the Initiative,[11] but in 2018, he rejected it as a basis for future negotiations with the Palestinians.[12]

    1
    [April 2024] Hamas official says group would lay down its arms if an independent Palestinian state is established
  • By that logic the US is the one preventing peace in the Middle East given how much weapons and political cover they give Israel. The US hasn’t even been holding Israel accountable for the expansion of illegal settlements despite the Oslo Accord and two-state promise since 1993.

    Iran is filling a gap that was left when Arab governments stopped caring about the resistance. Otherwise Iran being Shia is unpopular with the Sunni Palestinians.

    Oh and most funding actually comes from Qatar and other governments not just Iran. They also receive many donations from concerned people around the world, I am one concerned person.

  • Hamas presents new charter accepting a Palestine based on 1967 borders | Hamas | The Guardian

    amp.theguardian.com Hamas presents new charter accepting a Palestine based on 1967 borders | Hamas | The Guardian

    Document aims to heal divisions within Palestinian movement and ease peace process but Netanhayu says: ‘Hamas is attempting to fool the world’

    0

    Abbas delays Palestinian elections; Hamas slams 'coup'

    apnews.com Abbas delays Palestinian elections; Hamas slams 'coup'

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has announced the postponement of the first elections planned in 15 years, citing a dispute with Israel over voting in east Jerusalem.

    Abbas delays Palestinian elections; Hamas slams 'coup'
    0

    Hamas official says group would lay down its arms if an independent Palestinian state is established

    apnews.com Hamas official says group would lay down its arms if an independent Palestinian state is established

    The comments by Khalil al-Hayya came amid a stalemate in months of cease-fire talks.

    Hamas official says group would lay down its arms if an independent Palestinian state is established
    18