The guys doing the genocide and the guys fighting the genocide and for a secular democracy are the same actually /s
Are the real qualifications a caliper set and an unwillingness to talk about what they used to do before they got a position in the west German military?
If she is okay with things you should leave it alone, lest you put pressure on her to orgasm which is like, one of the least sexy things I can think of.
You can enjoy sex without orgasming. Sometimes my partner or I will opt for strap sex even though it is harder for both of us to orgasm because it feels nice/scratches a different itch. If she wanted to orgasm during sex she'd probably start masturbating to make it easier to do.
Talk to your partner about it
ICBM tests do fly in a very high arc though, the point is to test the range while making it clear that no one should be worried about it striking them.
This is vibes based politics.
No, an exploited class noticing their exploitation and some dude thinking he is entitled to having sex with women are not the same actually.
During revolutionary conditions a lot of bodyguards end up, you know... taking stock of where their class interests lie, if you know what I mean.
but doesn’t history teach us that violent revolution more often just begets more violence than actually solves problems?
Nope! Look at the life expectancy increases under socialist countries, they mathematically have less death!
Also compare red terrors casualty numbers to standard operating casualty numbers. Like 20 million people die of capitalism caused deprivation a year worldwide today.
If it is wrong when the union troops kill natives, then it has to be wrong when the natives kill settlers! /s
Please read about settler colonialism, this isn't a symmetrical situation.
The Nazis couldn't have done the holocaust without IBM, yeah.
You're more likely to get a socialist revolution than democrats and Republicans getting rid of FPTP at a significant enough level to matter.
In the end, a populist agenda like he’s running,
Trump just straight up isn't a populist? Fascists are pseudo-populists at best. They don't actually care about democracy or what the majority want, just like liberals (using marxist definition of liberal)
But the soviet union didnt dissolve from a civil war, there was a US sponsored presidential coup?
Good faith efforts made by the party or by state and local dems who aren't party insiders?
I mean we have two parties fundamentally representing similar donor interests, they swap controlled opposition roles which is more convincing than one party constantly being controlled opposition.
The US, and bourgeois democracies in general, have less political variation than one party socialist democracies. In China you have everyone from liberals (right wingers) to Maoists in government. In the US you basically only have liberals and scratched liberals.
My personal belief is that is he’s elected, our contry is on course for a soviet style breakup.
What do you mean by this? We already have austerity politics, and there isn't a foreign superpower in control of most of our media apparatus.
It is literally more likely for a socialist revolution to happen in the US than for us to use STV enough to choose the president that way.
A kamikaze drone reportedly strikes an illegal outpost housing the United States
China court lauds rule of law, backs transgender worker fired for being ‘absent’ while on leave recovering from reassignment surgery
The rights of transgender workers in China have been given a shot in the arm after a Beijing court ruled in favour of an employee who was fired for taking time off to recover from gender reassignment surgery.
Any attack on a space asset of the DPRK will be considered a declaration of war
Press Statement by Spokesman for DPRK Ministry of National Defence Pyongyang, December 2 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Ministry of National Defence of the DPRK released the following press statement "Any attack on space asset of the DPRK will be deemed declaration of war against it" on Saturday:
The brigandish nature of the U.S., which regards it as its main lever for realizing its hegemonic wild ambition to commit outrageous and unlawful military intervention against sovereign countries, has been brought to light more clearly, occasioned by the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite launch.
An official concerned of the U.S. Space Command recently spouted rubbish hinting at a military attack on the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite, saying that the U.S. can decrease the enemy country's outer space operation capabilities by employing diverse "reversible and irreversible methods".
American military affairs experts comment that the U.S. Space Force can physically destroy not only opponent's satellite and satellite earth station but also get rid of enemy state's space force through jamming and virus-using cyber attack.
The U.S. Space Force's deplorable hostility toward the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite can never be overlooked as it is just a challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK, and more exactly, a declaration war against it.
Article 8 of the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", the main international outer space treaty, stipulates that any object launched into outer space definitely falls under the jurisdiction of the launcher state and the ownership of it never changes no matter it remains in outer space or returned to the earth.
This means that the reconnaissance satellite "Malligyong-1" is a part of the territory of the DPRK where its sovereignty is exercised.
Furthermore, reconnaissance satellite is not regarded as a space weapon by international law for its technical features aimed at observation.
If the reconnaissance satellite of the DPRK is regarded by the U.S. as a "military threat" that must be gotten rid of, countless spy satellites of the U.S. flying above the Korean peninsula region every day, exclusively tasked with monitoring the major strategic spots of the DPRK, should be deemed the primary targets to be destroyed by the armed forces of the DPRK.
By openly unveiling its aggression scheme to mount a military attack on a space asset of other sovereign country, a part of its properties and territory, the U.S. has proved itself its true colors as the chief culprit of evils seeking to realize its wild ambition for dominating the world by turning outer space, common wealth of humankind, into a theater of war.
It is the mission of the armed forces of the DPRK, specified by its constitution and other laws, to exercise their war deterrent to protect the state sovereignty and territorial integrity in case a lethal military attack is carried out against the country's strategic assets or it is judged that such attack is imminent.
In case the U.S. tries to violate the legitimate territory of a sovereign state by weaponizing the latest technologies illegally and unjustly, the DPRK will consider taking responsive action measures for self-defence to undermine or destroy the viability of the U.S. spy satellites by exercising its legitimate rights vested by international and domestic laws. -0- www.kcna.kp (Juche112.12.2.)
China's energy sector emissions Plateau, start to fall
Xi’s quest for global supremacy is in perfect alignment with the country’s clean-tech dominance
Is Ukraine's counteroffensive failing? Kyiv and its supporters worry about losing control of the narrative
Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.
Is Ukraine's counteroffensive failing? Kyiv and its supporters worry about losing control of the narrative
Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.
The US military can't use a 110 million dollar drone base in Niger
The US military cannot conduct drone operations from a base in Niger because the country’s military junta has closed its airspace.
Why was it there in the first place I wonder?
The US can't use a 110 million dollar drone base in Niger
The US military cannot conduct drone operations from a base in Niger because the country’s military junta has closed its airspace.
Why was it there to begin with I wonder?
They lied about Iraq. They lied about Afghanistan. Now they're lying about Ukraine.
Russia's invasion was a war crime. That's no excuse for the disastrous, destructive path of endless war
The far left of the US' overton arrow slit is backtracking on the war now. https://youtu.be/jpUN0q35Lak
Mainstream US news backsliding on the Ukraine war narrative is pretty newsworthy.