I disagree that blocking users or communities covers everything. Upvotes are for good content, neutral (no action) is for most posts that you just scroll past, but downvotes are for 5 second clips without sound that technically don't break any rules of the community. But maybe other people might disagree, and that's good, in that case they can upvote and the net value of the post is clear. If not, the OP gets a clear signal that the number of downvotes is higher than the number of upvotes and they can fuck right off with those posts.
Especially if they also post other, high quality content, you can't expect me to just block the user who has done nothing wrong, or report their post that breaks no rules.
Or do you expect me to upvote literally everythingI scroll past (except the posts I would have downvoted)? I'll gladly do that if I can autmate it, otherwise ain't nobody got time fo that shit.
There's a different ai gen sublemmy (something with kink in it?) that's intended for creepy/abnormal/... stuff like this, it might not be well received there either but at least it shouldn't be downvoted like here, where users expect pretty ai porn instead of ... this.
Heads up: something in your link breaks redgifs (at least on my phone) (connect for lemmy app, in case that matters)
https://www.redgifs.com/watch/cleanlovelycottonmouth works fine, but your link has some stuff behind the