Read the accepted answer, it provides, in my opinion proper, reasoning for why it was a civil and not a criminal trial.
Going by that logic, hasn't Trump defrauded big banks rich people have huge amounts of assets in?
I suggest you scroll down.
My bad, of course, not sure why the defamation trial was still in my head.
SBF engaged in things like securities fraud as well, which is harder to spin into a civil thing I guess.
My bet on why they decided to go the civil route is that Trump has the money to make things right (if he will that's another thing), and SBF has nothing.
So they've just decided to go the "better for everybody" route, since, well, it's better for everybody.
Oh yeah, we're talking about the New York Trump corp trial :)
In that case, here's a nice explanation why a criminal trial wouldn't make sense and why a civil one is much better for everyone
Your comment proves you don't understand what's happening. At all.
Trump defamed someone. That's a civil issue. He was put on trial. On a civil trial. Because it's a civil issue. He lost. He got fined. Not sent to jail. Because it's a civil trial.
Poor chap, imagine training your whole life just to be shot down by a friendly.
Nice shot though.
A bunch of text, all of it unrelated to the question.
Trump lost a civil trial, SBF lost a criminal trial.
You can't be sent to jail for breaking civil laws.
Your bones are broken then, because that's just straight up not how it works.
Trump was fined because it was a civil trial that he lost. In this instance. His criminal trials are ongoing.
SBF is getting locked up because it was a criminal trial that he lost.
Words evolve, and sometimes, they gain new meanings. "Bare metal" is not a scientific terms, and so it can be bent depending on the context.
You can either accept that or not, it doesn't change the fact that that's what it now can mean.
It's just what it means in this specific context.
They're not running directly on the host, with directly meaning directly.
If you go by definition, I agree with you, but the definition is not always the thing to go off of.
Have you read my comment? It's about where the packages and services are installed.
In this case, they're installed in the container, not on the host
Not in this context. Bare metal means all packages and services installed and running directly on the host, not through docker/lxc/vms
Earth doesn't have any bills though, dues to the United Federation of Planets are set to start in 2161 at the earliest
Yeah that's fucking retarded of them
it's satire
Yep, guess that'd do it.
You'd still have to handle transferring keys across your devices, every time you login on a new one.
Also, searching would probably not work, at least as well as it does right now, since all messages are indexed on the discord side, which they wouldn't be able to do without seeing them. Everything would have to happen on device, meaning the devide would have to store all messages.
They are exchanged between the two devices.
Have you tried using Signal on desktop? It doesn't offer history syncing. Cross device for whatsapp for example is also a terrible experience. Unusable for something like Discord.
For a seamless experience Discord would probably have to store the keys themselves, defeating the whole point.
You're actually joking with the "inviter providing the decryption keys to the invitee" part right?
The whole point why people use discord is that it's simple, this is a feature that'd only annoy the average person, and every single extra step is a disaster for user retention (look at any eshop study).
Stuff like this is completely irelevant to discord, the tiny subset of people who actually care will and should use Matrix / other solutions, because that's the people they were made for.
Do you want to explain how to do it better?
Cross-container/vm communication security on Proxmox
Hey, I've got a bunch of services all running in their own containers/vms on Proxmox. All of these have their own ips that are accessible from my network.
I also have a container with a reverse proxy, which acts as a gateway for access to these services (it's IP is the only one allowed to go through the firewall of each service).
These services have http servers, no encryption. Could someone on my network listen to comms between a service and my reverse proxy?
Would have to play around with VLANs if that's the case...
Thanks