Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JU
JustVik @lemmy.ml
Posts 2
Comments 27
What is your opinion of Joseph Stalin?
  • He is an ambiguous person. He certainly did a lot of good things, but there were mistakes and even from our point of view, quite cruel decisions. It is difficult to assess why he made certain decisions. There is a lot of unconfirmed information and ambiguous accusations around him, although, of course, there are bad decisions, maybe we don't know all the information, or maybe he was wrong. It was a difficult time back then. According to some reports, at the end of his life, even Lenin treated him ambiguously and was afraid of the concentration of power in one hand and even wrote a letter to the congress, but some doubt this, so it may not be true. To truly understand this, you need to be a historian and read a lot of original documents by yourself. But I don't think that we should consider him only a complete villain, as he is often exposed.

  • What scientific study are you waiting for that'll just shit on everything we've once thought to have believed in?
  • I consider Extended Wigners Friend Problem Experiment to be quite fascinating. This experiment has already been performed, but I expect its results to be fully understood by the masses. And I am not proffesional physicist and want to understand it better too by myself. a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality The results of this experiment call into question one or more assumptions about the existence of objective reality, freedom of choice, or locality. All three cannot exist together. But personally, I think that the second and third points have been checked a lot of times, so no matter how improbable it may seem, the first point is the most likely. But what it really means remains to be understood.

  • What was the last original movie you saw and how did you watch it?
  • It's unusual, but it was a little-known Russian movie from which I didn't expect much, but in the end I liked it. It was Lord of the Wind (2023). Although I usually don't like modern movies lately. It is about Fyodor Konyukhov is a Russian survivalist, voyager, aerial and marine explorer and his round-the-world balloon flight. Unfortunately, I don't know if it is available in English.

  • Results in Duckduckgo have changed?
  • In general, I noticed that a significant degradation of search engines began to occur after the appearance of chatGPT, perhaps this is somehow related. Before that, degradation was slower. Maybe in Google for example they were a little afraid that ChatGPT would learn from their search engines and replace them...

  • Help me identify plants in my aquarium if you have free time. :)

    Once I bought a set of plants cheaply, but the disadvantage was that even the seller himself did not know the exact names of these plants. Please help me roughly identify the plants in my aquarium if you have free time. :)

    I know that there is a bit of Java moss in the upper center.

    Other photos:

    1- https://pxscdn.com/public/m/_v2/97422265439883264/9da63c77d-bc90ba/2Y7ztxF5OhF5/XatFdsUf93W6m1btC7H3ZDFhFzTAB1RuTO2LYsvt.jpg ^ This one looks like some kind of Vallisneria.

    2- https://pxscdn.com/public/m/_v2/97422265439883264/9da63c77d-bc90ba/xwq36tdy7LMh/NLgm3lgdnBLrTi6irJ6bWD5wxnurhfnb59zJ9Vvt.jpg

    3- https://pxscdn.com/public/m/_v2/97422265439883264/9da63c77d-bc90ba/ZPr0zlmeF1LE/7VqCUvRyJn0Q3JKFSp15vi5LzIabjAOu4H2uUZWq.jpg

    4- https://pxscdn.com/public/m/_v2/97422265439883264/9da63c77d-bc90ba/xjGyvctbwP1u/0iCuXZisnxnmqwiFlRsqGRWEnuIb2CMMRgVIgSOs.jpg

    EDIT:

    Thanks all for your answers. 2.- I think it is Ludwigia Repens. And it's across all of aquarium.

    4
    The "Nothing to hide" argument is a logical fallacy
  • Something like a joke about this:

    If you're working on something genius great, no matter who's watching you, they won't understand anything, but if you're doing ordinary things, it's really not that important that someone is watching.

    But of course, annoying comprehensive surveillance, especially from commercial companies, certainly should not be justified.

  • The big divide in the privacy community (threat model)
  • Yes, value can be expressed not only in monetary terms. If people find it very valuable, they should pay more attention to privacy. However, you can protect yourself from cryptolockers by remote backups as one of the ways.

  • The big divide in the privacy community (threat model)
  • Then all available and legitimate methods of ensuring confidentiality are adequate and justified. But sometimes at work you may need to use programs that you don't really like etc. And without work, you will have nothing to eat. Maybe a little exaggerated.

    Speaking specifically about me, I try to use free and open source software to the maximum extent possible. I only run non-free games sometimes. And sometimes some propriatary software for/at work.

  • How can I add a simple requirement "do not train Al on the source code of the program" to AGPLv3 or GPLv3 and thereby create a new license?

    How can I add a simple requirement "do not train Al on the source code of the program" to AGPLv3 or GPLv3 and thereby create a new license?

    Don't know is it a good place for such a question but I try :).

    Why did I come up with such an stupid idea? There have been reported cases where artificial intelligence such as Github Copilot has been trained on many open source and free software projects, and in some cases it can output code snippets from GPL-licensed projects without specifying it. https://www.pixelstech.net/article/1682104779-GitHub-Copilot-may-generate-code-containing-GPL-code

    I am not a lawyer, and I do not know where it is better to insert such a requirement. And how to formulate it in the best and correct form.

    I understand it maybe complicated to check, to comply with this requirement and it may cause other difficulties, but I still think it can be a useful addition.

    How to fit it with the fundamental freedoms of the GPL or it is unfitable?

    I understand that this would make the license non-free, since it puts constraints on what the code can be used for. It's sad that it doesn't combine in some way. Maybe change requirements to do not train "closed source AI"(without code and training data of AI model publicly available).

    And how can I name it? Is it better to name it without "GPL" If this new license cannot be considered free? NoAIFL or your variants :)?

    Is it good to just add a new item?

    For example like this:

    Additional Clause: You may not use the source code of this program, or any part thereof, to train any artificial intelligence model, machine learning model, or similar system without explicit written permission from the copyright holder.

    or

    Section [X]: Restrictions on AI Training You may not use the source code of this program, or any part thereof, to train any artificial intelligence model, machine learning model, or similar system without explicit written permission from the copyright holder.

    What you think about it? Maybe you already know licenses like this?

    21