Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GT
GTG3000 @programming.dev
Posts 0
Comments 217
I redid the meme with what hurts me
  • Man, the variable scoping thing is insidious. It will never not be weird to me that ifs and loops don't actually create a new scope.

    And then you try to do a closure and it tells you you didn't import anything yet.

  • What's your radical opinion?
  • I think they're called "hygienic showers" and it's basically a small showerhead with a thumb button on the end to turn on/off. They're getting pretty trendy with new construction flats.

    The only downside is that they tend to drip a bit after you return them to the cradle.

  • Fennel: a Lua-like LISP
  • Wait, let is to introduce locals but local is to introduce variables available in the whole file?

    ...so local creates global variables? What?

    ...and local creates constant values?

  • so my friend asked me to explain whats an rss feed
  • Yeah, I remember when I was trying to parse XML into some lua tables and it forever stumped me how to represent something like

    <thing important_param=10 other_param="abracadabra"> stuff </thing>
    

    You just have to have different ways to turn different tags into stuff in your program and that's a huge amount of overhead to think about when all I want is a hash map and maybe an array.

  • Why YAML sucks?
  • It's inconsistent and annoying. Expressive, yes. Gets it's job done, yes. Absolute nightmare of a spec, YES.

    The fact that JSON is a subset of YAML should tell you everything about how bloated the spec is. And of course there's the "no" funny things.

    Personally, my favourite way to write configs was using lua (because it was already part of the project so why not), but JSON does fine.

  • Look you've just to got read the prologue that was a limited edition IHOP giveaway in 2015 and the story is awesome
  • Well, it was a spur-of-the-moment sort of thing when I went and looked at their site and it just had a bunch of names with no numbers there under the book art.

    Went and checked now and site looks entirely different, and I can clearly see the issue numbers. I don't know, maybe I hallucinated it.

  • Radioactivity
  • Chernobyl isn't safe safe, it's just safe enough for wildlife to survive there, possibly with lowered life span and quality of life.

    Also, there's a decent danger of radioactive dust coming off the book if it's handled. It may not be that radioactive, but if it clings to you, or you breathe it in, it will do considerably more damage than if it was all one solid rock that made geiger counters click.