They just bought up the largest waterpark in Illinois..... yep, a waterpark.
The last article I read on it said they had big ideas to increase profit at the waterpark and it was something the old owners never thought of, which is to start selling alcohol. I can't imagine how much a watered down margarita at a waterpark is going to cost.
Good to know, I'll check them out as well! Thank you
This has me seriously considering using a company like privacy.com to just create random CC numbers per sketchy website.
Honestly, that is what hurt the experience more than anything, not having the capacity to support an event that is meant to show off what your game can do and hopefully entice new players (assuming that's what the free fly events are for) is just going to leave a bad impression on people just checking out the game. I tried several times over a span of 3-4 days to get some footing, but found myself just having to Alt+F4 in most cases.
If the servers actually worked, I could have looked up a video or 2, tried out a few free ships (assuming a new player can find the event which is an entirely different issue), etc. But all I'm left with is no desire to even buy a starter pack.
I heard good things about new patch so I gave the free fly a shot last week....
A decade of development and I couldn't even complete a lot of the things I was trying to do, it was so laggy that it wasn't even registering actions I was taking to progress the starter quest and the servers crashed 2 or 3 times just when I was trying to get off the starter planet making me repeat the "tutorial". I feel like even if it was good, it's a game that now you have to spend 10 hours on youtube trying to figure out all the in game systems and what you want to do
Did you change the native VLAN to IoT or just added the tag and left the native VLAN on the switch port set to default? You should be able to change the native VLAN and leave tagged VLANs as "allow all".
My only other thought is how did you isolate the IoT network and are you able to access other devices from default to IoT?
I've had it running for a few months, I don't use it that often but it's been super handy when I need it.
Please don't waste precious opalesence on him.
HP has been doing it for at least 20 years, I remember doing HW scans to send for contract renewals and I'm almost positive that included iLO licensing. Back then it was a "luxury" because we still had most of our servers on prem and could walk up to the KVM if needed. But, maybe you're talking about back before that time.
However, I agree, it doesn't make it right, but it also doesn't mean it hasn't been done for a long time.
I don't think that's entirely correct depending on what you call the "past", I have an HP server that is about 10-15 years old that I cant use iLO after post because of the same message. They have charged for OOB management for years, but I think it was rolled into support contracts. This server was from an old job and iLO worked when it was dcommed
Mine as well, i have a closet with a half rack with all my networking gear, NAS, UPS, proxmox server, etc. If I'm gone, it's time for whoever lives here to just get a combined router/modem from the ISP and call it a day.
"can't use the wiring" So in the old days they made people leave all their phones connected when they moved right? /s
You're not wrong and, to be fair, I'm mostly exaggerating when I say to rip out all the smart stuff.
Thermostat would stay, Alexa is being phased out but google home would stay, flood sensors I have at this time do not beep because of the stress is causes the pets just during normal testing, but those could be easily replaced.
However, I also have a ton of lighting, zigbee sensors, zigbee smart plugs, camera motion automations, alarm system automations, garage door automations, and other routines that can't just be taken over by someone that has no desire to mess with HA. It's not always about the functionality of the device itself, but what HA does to enhance it.
It's especially true when it comes to things like HACS. I love HA but I've also told everyone I know that, if I die, rip all that shit out and replace all the "smart" stuff with regular stuff.
I'm not sure if you meant to reply to me, but that's what I have been saying, if it says it's a rendering, I don't see how it's different.
Documentaries have had drawings, with a disclaimer that it is an artist rendering, for as long as I can remember. Or what about when they hire actors to do a “dramatization” of what happened, how is this different?
The quote above is in my first post in this thread. And to say a human can't render as well as a machine, is arguable, but that isn't what this is about.
So again, if people are told that it's a rendering, regardless of who or what rendered it, what is the issue, and should all past documentaries with human renderings/reenactments not be called documentaries?
Again, how is this different from an artist rendering? There's been artists creating digital media for documentaries for a long long time.
Just to play devil's advocate, does that mean any "artist rendering" shouldn't be in a documentary? Documentaries have had drawings, with a disclaimer that it is an artist rendering, for as long as I can remember. Or what about when they hire actors to do a "dramatization" of what happened, how is this different?
Happened to me yesterday as well. It would have been enough XP for my promotion to Skull Admiral as well so it double stung.