This is it, the megathread. Please keep it limited to this one, we don't need the same event spammed 50 times.

Removed, R2.

R1, removed for copyright. In the future, please don't repost the news articles in the comments.

Rule 2, Posts must be conservative. Removed.

Rule 2, removed. Posts must have a pro-right wing, or anti-left wing bias.

Removed, R1, no slurs.

Thats fair, and thats exactly why I let you make the decision.

You know what, no, I'm not. I'm going to turn off my computer, and go drink a couple more beers and do literally anything but get on lemmy tonight.

You made a false assumption, and went all in on sources that depend on that assumption.

Mate, here's a great example of you intentionally pissing everyone off. Look at how much effort you put into the comment, you got sources and everything. But you're still managed to piss everyone off, while maintaining a thin facade of civility. We can see past it at this point, you aren't here to discuss or anything, just to troll.

A try-hard troll is still a troll.

I'm still going to let peepin make the final decision, but I fully recommend a ban.

You know what, this is starting to get weird. Do you mind posting stuff other than race/sex stuff? Guns are a good topic. Maybe taxes?

Tbh, there has been a lot of race focused posts lately. I'm toying with the idea of some sort of temporary halt on the topic, not sure if that'd make things worse. Streisand Effect and all.

Direct link to the judgement, if you dont care to click three times. https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=YAzIxNWUH83WonX87mAkVg==

Basically, you cant be forced to violate the 4th to practice your 2nd

Permanently Deleted

Oddly enough, he shows as I clicked once on lemm.ee, not twice.

Hes a mod to be clear.

Im going to chalk it up to federation.

Look momo, I know it's frustrating. I suggest blocking him, instead of breaking rule 1.

Consider this a final warning before I start banning, alright?

Removed, rule 2. Posts must have a conservative bias. This is just advocating for red flag laws.

I've been thinking about this.

I'm not sure that it not being binding is super telling. He explained that he was getting rejected without getting reviewed, and the people he linked were all DEI affiliated. It seems like a logical conclusion to me.

Can you link something that backs you up? NTB posts some stuff that doesn't often get covered by other news outlets. They might not be up to your standards, but they seem to be pretty good.

In any case, it's a right-wing site, posting with a right-wing bias. That's what this sub is all about.

Peepin, do you have any evidence to the contrary of what NTB wrote?

Isn't nonce just british for pedo?