Some type of BASIC came first along with Batch (if it counts) and later Visual Basic. All sorts of easy things that I fully advocate for as first languages in education. The next step for me was C/C++ and various different languages that are more learning examples than anything now like COBOL and Pascal. And then for school, I picked up Python, Java, C#, Ruby, and a smattering of ARM Assembler.
I use a lot of languages for school, but outside of that, depending on the research I'm doing, projects I'm working on, and other things, it varies between C++ (which I use for analytics and research stuff) and Python (which is much nicer for automation and interacting with distributed computing). Bash finds itself very close behind them for automation when I'm being too lazy to write Python.
I feel that. I switched from a GTX era GPU to a 7800XT as well recently. It's night and day how many generic glitches and program limitations I don't have to deal with anymore.
Everyday there are more things that fail to separate Windows from its past versions in functionality, but detriment the usability of all the versions to come. Microsoft is changing arbitrary things like this (let's face it, there aren't many people truly effected by not having WordPad) just for the sake of changing, not for any foreseeable benefit.
As a LibreOffice, OpenOffice, MS Office 2000, and unfortunately Google Suite user, I've seen that there are many effective replacements, so I don't see this impacting anyone too severely. It's just stupid.
This is a cool technology, making the assumption that it's real, but due to cost and scaling limitations, I doubt we'll see it outside of specialized use cases any time soon. For expensive use cases that have unique cases for it, it might prove interesting.
Not many new ideas, but plenty of old ideas that I might want to finish before school really gets going. Haven't felt satisfied with anything enough to throw anything out there in a couple years, so maybe it'll change.
I'm not really into the mobile handheld gaming market, but I am very happily reaping the benefits of a growing platform. I have to use Windows less and less everyday and that's in no small part because Valve became suddenly interested in Steam OS again.
I really miss old Reddit. That's absolutely awesome.
My preferences aren't super strong, but I like Xfce because of its lightweightness and customizability. Prior to Xfce, I used Gnome...which is neither of those but still fine.
Usually, I name it quite literally, or whatever my superior has already planned to name it. If I'm working on a team, I cede to someone else. If I can't think of a name, it gets a ambiguous name and a date. This goes for my programming projects and not programming projects alike.
Yeah! You could basically warp time (and later, space in the sequel). Rewind to access areas, fast forward to jump things, pause to defeat enemies, and even record to have yourself so multiple things at once. I wish Microsoft and Artoon did something with that, but the popularity of Halo (namely in the US and EU markets) overshadowed every other Xbox exclusive.
I'm 99% sure everything for me can be traced back to Blinx: The Time Sweeper, an old Xbox exclusive with anthro cats and pigs. Really awesome game, and to this day, I think it was a gem of mechanics and dynamics that it's a pity never became something more. That would've started in around '06. I was 3-4.
I didn't know the concept of furry until '16 or so, when I would've been 13-14. I had a fascination with fur and animal stuff, and a younger friend (he was like 12) said something like "Oh, so you're a furry?" A few googles later...I was like GOD NO. Came back by early-2017, with a more careful Google and an open mind, and yeah, I was. Joined a furry forum in mid-2017, and the rest is history. Seen a lot of stuff in my time here, but unfortunately, I arrived too late to see a lot of the furry community that used to exist in my local area. Just a few years too young to have caught RCFM.
Hello! I'm Bluefox. I'm mostly a C/C++ programmer, but dabble in Java because school makes me. I also have an interest in COBOL, Pascal, and Fortran, but haven't had the time to study them. Been attempting to code or fiddle with code at least since I was 8 or 9, and now I study it. Hoping to do research work with programming in the future.
From a general standpoint, I don't think that any Mastodon community stands much to lose for taking a neutral stance on Project 92. Meta isn't a threat to us because of how the fediverse works. It's not even guaranteed that their app will be 100% intercompatible with Mastodon. It might end up being another kind of halfway there integration that affords them and for that matter, us no benefit. The whole thing might not be something worth caring about, but it might not be great to take an actively positive stance on it, because of the amount of the fediverse moving against it.
From a community standpoint, it's possible we stand to lose more if the fediverse splinters into anti-Meta spaces, and Meta-neutral or pro-Meta spaces. What Meta coming to fedi has done is show that there is so much potential to divide up all these separated spaces into people disagreeing on points that might be irrelevant to the functionality of the platform. I personally see this nature of Meta as more dangerous than any threat they pose to the protocol. Divide and conquer. How many people are going to be upset when they end up on the "wrong" instance, for whatever their personal opinion is, and how is that going to effect smaller instances that people will learn not to trust, compared to large ones, run by corporations or large organizations. They are not taking over the fediverse, but attempting to divide it and corporatize it, along with any other large organization that wants to take advantage of it.
Either way, I don't believe that joining any pact is the way to go. Signing onto such a thing is a community commitment whose terms may change over time, to the dissatisfaction of at least one party involved. I believe any decision should be made by this individual instance without the active association with any other. Moving as a group is what Meta and every other corporation expects us to do, leaving us in a compromised state, and though for the past decade or so, it's how all online communities work, distributed networks allow us to question that status quo. I say no to the pact, but neutral on general defederating or silencing.
Lenovo is always a safe bet, but definitely feel free to explore your options since Lenovo's are typically pricier. I use an HP with an Nvidia 16xx card and Intel processor and it runs a dream except for the annoyance of Optimus (running Intel graphics and Nvidia graphics at the same time). I've installed Linux on a lot of laptops, and I've only had issue with two models. The Dell Latitude E6430 ATG (finicky wifi and non-functional fingerprint reader) and the Panasonic Toughbook CF-52 (bluetooth no work).
Generally though anything is fine, especially if made in the last 5 years or so. Linux compatibility is really great these days. The biggest issues I'd be worried about is which wireless card it has, and if you need a fingerprint reader (especially if you get a Dell).
Some wireless cards won't automatically have their drivers installed no matter how hard you try (you have to do manual set up), and as far as I know, Dell fingerprint readers still don't work.
I might be a little late, and this might be a little controversial, but I'll recommend to you what was recommended to me years ago. Ubuntu. Though the interface is different than it was in 2013 (they use a different desktop environment (DE) now), the spirit of ease-of-use is still there. Ubuntu is a rock-solid Debian based distro, which of course, there are a lot of. Ubuntu however (and I'd assume it's derivatives) go a step further for usability. Coming from Windows XP back then, everything just made sense. Software came from a place called Software, updates came from a place called Updates, and LibreOffice (OpenOffice branch; MS Office equivalent) is a pre-installed app. It also makes driver install (at least for Nvidia, not sure about AMD) easy, a single click will switch you from the nouveau (rather poor open source drivers) to nvidia's latest proprietary drivers, in the Software and Updates menu.
Out of the box, Ubuntu is set to handle it's updates semi-automatically (prompting you for permission). It's install process is a breeze compared to some distros, not being a several step process, but simply a boot-from-disk, follow instructions, process (pre-UEFI, it was arguably even simpler; openSuse also has this advantage). If you only have experience with Windows, Ubuntu is the place to go. If you want something that's similar enough to Windows' interface, but has it's own Linux-isms, I'd say your best bets are KDE (and relatedly, Kubuntu, which is Ubuntu with KDE out of the box). Some other people would recommend Cinnamon or MATE, which both have their own versions as well.
But if you want the Ubuntu experience, GNOME is bulky and sometimes annoying, but very charming. It's certainly better than Unity, which was the previous DE, that had a charming interface, but even more bulk than GNOME. I hope whatever you pick, you come to love (or at least not dislike) Linux. If you find that too much of your software doesn't have a Linux version, make sure to give Wine a go. It's not perfect, but it's nearly so for a lot of modern apps. Valve's equivalent to Wine (Proton) is even more effective, especially for games.
(As a side note, after several years of distro hopping on a secondary computer, my daily drivers changed to Arch earlier this year, which is lovely, but very involved.)
It used to be multiple workspaces, but with Windows having that now, it's just the ease of install and use of build tools.
Part of this is the existence of package managers, and part of it is just how well they integrate with the operating system. Using the GNU Compiler Collection on Linux or Linux-like systems is just so much less of a rigamarole compared to getting any usable set-up on Windows.
Another thing I miss when I go to use Windows is the compose key. It's so much better integrated on Linux. Mac's solution to special characters meanwhile is fine. Windows' just isn't.
Finally, and this is the biggest one is little power user customizability tools (yes, I know Microsoft has things made for this, but they aren't installed and/or available out of the box). Customizability of the programs one uses everyday and the overall behaviour of one's computer is an absolute must, but I understand why Microsoft moved Windows away from that model. Most people don't want or need that.
Others have mentioned it too, but Linux just doesn't get in your way like many other OSes do.
This is awesome. ^^ It's great that there's a use case for it and it looks cool.