You’re more likely to go to prison for exposing animal cruelty than for committing it
You’re more likely to go to prison for exposing animal cruelty than for committing it
California could send a man to prison for 3.5 years for rescuing factory-farmed animals. Where does the movement go from here?
Not really sure what to put here...I usually put relevant excerpts, but that got this post deleted for doing that
You're viewing a single thread.
There's a bit of difference between "exposing animal cruelty" and stealing livestock.
44 17 ReplyBit of a fucked up situation when conscious beings are considered property though.
5 1 ReplyMy cat is a conscious being.
I still own her.
1 3 ReplyI also have a cat.
I am her legal custodian, she isn't property.
3 0 Reply
I was just borrowing it osfficer
6 6 ReplyThey were stealing sick livestock that had no commercial value.
11 18 ReplyStill, that's a few steps further than just "exposing animal cruelty".
Not saying what they did was wrong at all, but the headline is definitely clickbait.
(Note: I haven't read past the headline or some of the comments, so I might be way off)
21 7 ReplyJuries didn’t view it as wrong in past court cases. This was the first one to land a conviction, and they did it by putting a gag order on all the footage the activists took, which in previous cases was instrumental in swaying juries.
14 0 Reply