You're viewing a single thread.
all humans are animals
all dogs are animals
therefore humans are dogs
not a very good argument imo
6 7 Replybut that's just straight up not the same logic at all
7 0 ReplyYou're doing all A are in C, all B are in C =⟩ A is in B, which makes no sense and isn't what they said.
They said all A are in B, all B are in C =⟩ A are in C, which is true by the transitive property.
All humans are animals
All animals are Pokemon
Therefore all humans are Pokemon
4 0 ReplyThat's a poorly constructed argument though. How about,
All animals are Pokémon.
Humans are animals.
Humans are Pokémon.
3 0 ReplyAll humans are animals All dogs are animals Not all animals are dogs Not animals are humans But all the animals in modern Pokemon are Pokemon So the question is Does animal == Pokemon If so human are Pokemon But if animal != Pokemon Then humans != Pokemon and human == animal
2 0 ReplyCertainly not fair to dogs.
2 0 Replyyeah i easily would trade a family member for a reality where my childhood dog was alive.
but maybe an extended family member im not sure.
2 0 Reply